nation is facing the most serious internal attacks on the frontal and institutional structures that define a democracy. since the pulitzer s were introduced a century ago. precisely to counteract problematic, authoritarian tendencies throughout the society. that warning was followed by the announcement of that year s pulitzer prize for national reporting which went to the washington post in new york times for quote, relentlessly reporting coverage in the public interest on russian interference in the 2016 election. and it s connections to the trump campaign, the president elect s transition team, and his eventual administration. that choice naturally drew the ire of then president donald trump, who did not stop complaining about the decision, even after he left the white house. it actually lead the pulitzer boards to open two separate independent investigations into the awarding of those prizes. this week, the pulitzer board announced the results of those investigations,
for the most outstanding journalism of the year, and they delivered this warning. on the political fronts, i think, it is clear that the nation is facing the most serious internal attacks on the fundamental values and institutional structures that define a democracy. since the pulitzer s were introduced a century ago. then precisely, to counteract problematic authoritarian tendencies, throughout the society. now that warning was followed by the announcement of that year s pulitzer prize for national reporting, which went to the new york times and the washington post for quote, relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest on russian interference in the 2016 election and its connection to the trump campaign, the presidents elects transition team, and his eventual administration. that choice naturally drew the ire of then president donald trump, who did not stop complaining about the decision, even after he left the white house. it actually lead the pulitzer board t
i m john berman. brianna is off. chief white house correspondent kaitlan collins is here. honored as always. a very busy morning. just one single text message, just one, a few minutes before midnight our jamie gangel broke the news that the secret service turned over just one text message in response to a request by the homeland security inspector general. this is about text messages sent before and around the attack on the capitol on january 6, 2021. according to a letter obtained by cnn from the inspector general to the january 6th committee, the ig asked for a month s worth of records from 24 secret service personnel and was provided with just one single text he is change about january 6th. this comes as the national archives has asked the secret service to investigate saying they are aware of the, quote, potential unauthorized deletion of agency text messages. committee member zo lofgren calls it problematic. the secret service has turned over thousands of pages of
that s began to appeal to center right democrats, and independent voters who typically and traditionally voted democratic. it gave them a choice to consider. what dan cox has done extensively, is by defeating kelly, take that choice away from those voters. the likelihood that they are going to, in the first instance, the first blush, vote for somebody who believes that joe biden was installed in the white house. it busts people to january 6th, call the vice president pence a traitor. these are going to be the these are larry hogan voters. no, they re not going to vote for dan cox in that regard. this is going to be a very difficult struggle for the gop, to hold the governor s mansion
call the vice president pence a traitor. these are going to be the larry hogan voters. no, they re not going to vote for dan cox in that regard. this is going to be a very difficult struggle for the gop, to hold the governor s mansion holding this summer. give me your political stance here for a moment. what should democrats do to more effectively propose these candidates. i want to be careful in the way that we characterize those ads. democrats are paying for them, but we are really running. they are leading the republican field, and in any campaign, candidates attack one another, are the democrats who are running these ads during the primaries, are they galvanizing trump supporters to the republican voters? to the advantage of those far-right candidates, or should they just simply ignore them it till they get to the general election? what is the smart play here for the democrats? i think that what you have