in that opening statement they spoke in just excruciating detail about the extent of the injuries suffered by the three people who died at the funnish line the 260 others who were injured. the defense, ana, then got up and said they re not pleerhere to dispute the facts of the case. they don t dispute his involvement in the death of an mit officer, in the shoot-out with watertown police but say they are here to draw a distinction what motivated him to do this. they say he s a young man unduly influenced by his brother, the mastermind of this. the prosecution says that dzhokhar was self-radicalized and spewing the rhetoric of al qaeda. he left behind a note that parroted that rhetoric before he was found. what s the difference here ana? why does all of this matter? it comes down to phase two of this trial which is the penalty part of the trial. 17 charges come with a possible death sentence so the defense will work over the next couple weeks or months to build a sympathetic a portrait a
thought. it s ridiculous. it is horrible. i don t think anybody really got the penalty part of obama care in general. they got the free part. everybody hears free health care but they didn t know there s a penalty floating off in the distance. that s the problem here. you told me you still trust obama care. they re taking out my gallbladder later tonight in i can get through to them. where are you guys going? he won t tell me. the gallbladder won t talk either. it s stunning when you look at the roll out of this. i want to say i think the republican party really made a big mistake. when you re enemy is killing themselves like the worth thing you want to do is get in the way of them. if they had been talking about debt limit and government shutdown instead of obama care, this would have been in. i agree. i believe people got wrapped up in a false better that they knew
deadline is way sooner than they thought. it s ridiculous. it is horrible. i don t think anybody really got the penalty part of obama care in general. they got the free part. everybody hears free health care but they didn t know there s a penalty floating off in the distance. that s the problem here. you told me you still trust obama care. they re taking out my gallbladder later tonight in i can get through to them. where are you guys going? he won t tell me. the gallbladder won t talk either. it s stunning when you look at the roll out of this. i want to say i think the republican party really made a big mistake. when you re enemy is killing themselves like the worth thing you want to do is get in the way of them. if they had been talking about debt limit and government shutdown instead of obama care, this would have been in. i agree. i believe people got wrapped up
and talked act premium change, everything else. even if they believe that that, what is wrong with the last proposal we put out for members of congress to live under the exchanges exactly the same as the american people and do a one-year delay on just the penalty part for individuals saying if an individual makes a mistake at some point in the first year of implementation they shouldn t face a penalty for that? i don t see anything wrong with that and i think it s reasonable. why attach this to a six-week funding bill? this seems to be another point of contention and frankly a part i don t get. if you guys want to extract one-year concessions, asking for one-year concessions on issues and you re doing a six-week it s over six-week funding bill, it would be pretty stooupd negotiating tactic on democratic side to agree to something like that. why not do this over the actual annual budget and go to conference on that? well, part of the reason is because the senate s not responding t
writing for a 5-4 majority, he latched onto the penalty part, calling it a tax and deeming that constitutionally kosher. i know the debate over this law has been divisive. i respect the very real concerns americans have shared. i know a lot of coverage through this health care debate has focused on what it means politically. well, it should be pretty clear by now that i didn t do this because it was good politics. i did it because i believed it was good for the country. president obama today. here s mitt romney. as you might imagine, i disagree with the supreme court s decision. and it agree with the dissent. what the court did not do on its last day in session, i will do on my first day if elected president of the united states. and that is, i will act to repeal obama care. governor romney called it bad law and bad policy. but keeping them honest, it is also nearly identical to his own plan as governor of massachusetts. as for the mandate, well, keeping them honest,