the dnc for filing the lawsuit in the beginning, saying that it wasn t so unreasonable a thing to do that it would require some sort of penalizing of the dnc. this is one of a number of big court cases that the president has won in recent weeks. however, this idea of the witch hunt ending might be a little bit premature. because certainly there are committees on capitol hill that continue investigations of the president. in fact, we may hear in the next couple of days whether or not the house judiciary committee led by jerrold nadler of new york is going to go to court to try and force don mcgahn to comply with the subpoenaed to testify before that committee. thanks a lot still in the works here, claiming victory on the witch hunt maybe a little premature. spew on the democrats. you talk about chairman nadler, they are out right now on summer break and still talking about investigations and how far they will go with it. real quickly? not to say that it s a witch hunt, but the preside
we, we are frying to figure that out. we want what is most pro dock tiff. move it forward. not looking simply to penalize the administration for the sack of penalizing. people are saying that s what we should do. we are going to have to figure out what the most constructive way forward is. and i think the judge is feels the same way. he is not going to, give them any wiggle room anymore. he has seen that they cannot do it themselves. and he is going to stay on top of them. we will try to figure out what we thing the sanction should be. because they obviously are not going to meet the deadline by today at midnight. lee. thank you for your time. thank you, don. yeah. when we come back, what the president s supreme court pick could mean for the russia investigation. turns out, he could impact it in a very big way. belly fat: the chili pepper sweat-out. not cool. freezing away fat cells with coolsculpting? now that s cool!
picture is improving for everyone and that does raise all boats. also, the united states is now, as i understand it, the world s number one producer of oil. so, our economy industry has also been energized, so to speak, by the president. so, he does have to finesse this message and the policies because most of what we talked about on this show, tariffs are a blunt instrument. there s a lot more to be done in terms of international cooperation with our trading partners across the world and in terms of penalizing they re not hopping along with us on this. and that s where things you get a the a local store, you could start seeing a rise in price. farmers are seeing with soy beans, since the chinese stopped buying them. so a little anecdotal information that it could hit and hit hard. look, a strong economy and good job market can build people, yeah, prices are higher. if we go to $100 an oil, 4.50 gas and then out of china,
government. specifically these documents because the special counsel say that anyone was reaching out to the russian ambassador to tell him don t overreact to the obama administration s sanctions for interfering in the 2016 election, don t overreact because we re coming in. and then also reaching out as directed by jared kushner, we re told, to the russian ambassador to try to get him to either delay or vote against a u.n. security council resolution that the obama administration abstained from having to do with punishing or penalizing or condemning israel for its settlements. whether or not you agree with the individual policies, does that bother you? look, it is contrary to hong-standing principles, that you have one president at a time. this is the a hawaii in the books that says private
let me ask you about that, because specifically these documents from the special counsel say michael flynn was reaching out to the russian ambassador to tell him don t overreact to the obama administration s sanctions for interfering in the 2016 election, don t overreact because we re coming in. and then also reaching out as directed by jared kushner, we re told, to the russian ambassador to try to get him to either delay or vote against a u.n. security council resolution that the obama administration quite controversially abstained from having to do with punishing or penalizing or condemning israel for its settlements. these are clear reactions against what the white house wanted at the time, whether or not you agree with the individual policies, does that bother you? look, it is contrary to long-standing principles, that you have one president at a time. there s good reason for that, one is this is cnn breaking news.