and go, that s a terrible thing. my comment is, should have been there from the beginning. i don t know why the committee is doing that. maybe they want to focus everything on trump. to me there were a lot of enablers there that got us to this point. you re right about that. why isn t pence testifying himself, though? i don t know. that i can t answer why he s not testifying. i don t have the answer to that. one thing that is been interesting to me and i ve been hearing this more from people is you can t never go back is would it have been better if pelosi allowed mccarthy to appoint some republicans. it would have been disruptive but wouldn t that create an atmosphere where people who say i m not going to watch that, that s just a kangaroo court, would it have been better if we truly had a bipartisan committee
so chaney and kinzinger, come on? do you get any more conservative than chaney and kinzinger. a man who fought for our country. you and i you and i understand it. at the time i thought, well, you know, pelosi didn t want these disrupters on here. the question is, for the future, do we want to just put people on even when at times they will not be very tolerable in terms of the way they discuss things. i m just concerned it s taken away from this sort of definition of bipartisan. if we were in a time look, i think if romney was the president, then maybe, okay. but this is a different time when we didn t have or if i were president, don. that we had people that wanted to kill the democracy.
insurrection but tweeting from florida that is the problem that we re seeing here. i am disgusted, disappointed and ultimately concerned because their failure to do anything in the last year, year and a half from the insurrection becomes the more dire as we move into the fall if republicans take over the house. it feels like donald trump might actually be above the law. i mean, i ve never seen anything like it, jill. this man got away with tax evasion. new york stood down. it looks like the doj is standing down. what is it about this one person and everyone close to him that they do feel like they are above the law? he has got more than teflon than anybody i know. it is inconceivable to me that he has gotten away with all of the things, you know, when the campaign was still going, i thought that the statements about grabbing something would have been the end of the candidacy but it didn t bother anybody. and so it is very troubling that
that s what stealing the election is. remember, democrats don t believe in democracy. oh, irony. trump dubbed him lying ted for a reason because speaker pelosi didn t say anything about this year s election being stolen but while we re at it, ted, this you? this subject the washington post your role supporting a coup after he lost. the same ted cruz that pledged to support a gop nominee and accused his father of assassinating jfk. this you ted? my pledge was not a blanket commitment that if you go and slander and attack heidi that i m going to nonetheless come like a puppy dog and say thank you very much. it only took a few years of getting dog walked by trump to turn his frown upside down and his nose doodoo brown.