Resulted from her pregnancy and not from one of those conditions, u. P. S. Rejected her request. That we submit is a violation of the second clause of the pda, which if it means anything, must mean that when an employee seeks an accommodation or benefit due to her pregnancy, that she is entitled to the same accommodation that her employer would have given her. You make it sound as if the only condition that was not accommodated was lifting restriction because of pregnancy. And i did not understand that to be the case. Thats the way you start, you want to say its only pregnancy. Unless ive missed something. Well i so i think on the Summary Judgment record here, your honor, the three very broad classes of limitations that u. P. S. Accommodates do at least theres a genuine issue of material fact this they cover the waterfront of everything but pregnancy. But our position is that those three broad classes by themselves, even if there are some conditions out there that they dont cover sorry
They cost us republicans three senate seats. We were poised to win nevada delaware and colorado where the incumbents delaware wasnt an incumbent, but mike cassell was running and hes tremendously popular, the tea party came in, the people did not participate in the primaries to the degree they should have, and the tea party nominated unelectable nominees in all three states and handed the democrats three seats they would not have otherwise had. In 2012 they handed the democrats three more with scary candidates. In 2010 it was the candidate who ran her Campaign First televised ad saying, i am not a witch. Thats a really, really jaunty catchy kind of political platform to run on. And then the other guy in 2012 was talking about legitimate rape, another political position i would recommend any of you thinking of being candidates you should avoid being in favor of that kind of thing. Add it all up if we had those we republicans this those six seats from the two previous elections, plus whe
Separately in his own opinion and labeled it dubious because he didnt think that the use of the word threat means you got to mean it to be a threat. It doesnt matter the criminal law very rarely has any liability of what a reasonable person think. Its got to be the guilty mind of the person doing it. So the court added that second question. I think the importance of this case is whether the case goes off on the statutory ground or the constitutional ground. This is just one federal statute and you can start again, you can try again later. Although the Roberts Court has somewhat of a practice of throwing water on the issues and giving everybody a chance of trying to trim their sales before they invalidate their statutes. It will be more important if it goes up on a constitutional ground because you have several statutes, not all of which include a subjective intent requirement. In addition, there are several different federal statutes. It is interesting thats goes up on the constitution
Sfond to that . Saysll the Tillis Campaign senator hagan is too closely aligned with president obama. They point to some policies, particularly the health care law. If you look at the upcoming debate between these two candidates courtesy of wraltv, what are you looking for . Its a whans for the candidates to show voters directly how theyre different from one another. Some experts will think perhaps they will bring up things that didnt come up on the first debate on september 3rd, that might be issues like Voting Rights and gun control. Ibs also possible like top like ebola and iraq and syria. Speaker tillis has been trying to use some Foreign Policy issues to show his strength and criticize senator hag. What does the Tillis Campaign have on the ground no North Carolina and conversely the hagan campaign . It is more complicated in a midterm ewlecks theres no president ial race. Both parties have people knocking on doors. They also have groups that support them out doing the same thing.
Quote, widespread employment gains, improved manufacturing, especially in autos and aerospace. Construction and real estate expanded and lending was steady or rising. Melissa, back to you. Melissa there you go. Very positive it seems like. Tom sullivan, what do you make of that . Well there is something that fundamentally, economics 101 is wrong with this and Federal Reserve is latest to do this they talk about the fact gasoline prices are down, therefore will boost spending. I go, where did the extra money come from . All it is im reallocating my money from gasoline to movie tickets. But i doesnt have extra money to put into the economist. They keep saying somehow people are spending more. Melissa they talk about widespread employment gains. A lot of upbeat language in there. I hear what youre saying. We had a pretty good fdp print. So which are moving on. Charlie has a scoop about uber. Goldman for uber. Why is it doing that . In preparation from ipo, from bankers, every firm, are no