they cherry pick literature, extend their window for what is accept able for consideration if there s a paper they think helps and ignore papers that don t. sean: patrick michaels experienced the ipcc s biased firsthand. they said they would keep a paper of mine out even if they to review what the peer review literature was. they were bound and determined to have a point of view come through and they succeeded. sean the ipcc s reputation has come under fire for a series of errors in in its reports. those errors all point in the same direction. towards creating a problem where there isn t one. and towards exaggerating it where there is. sean: this is a used in the first and second assessment reports. it shows what scientists refer to as the medieval warm period during which temperatures were as high or higher than they are today. if true this casts doubt on the idea that humans caused
the panel claims to reflect the beliefs of a so-called scientific consensus. of the notion of science by authority is kind of stupid and counter to science as it is supposed to be conducted. only the politicians want science as a sensors of authority. the ippc sells it s agenda through assessment reports. the reports push for international treatise to curbti emissions byes painting a pictun of an an environment armagedon. critics object to how the reports are compiled. the sign tests who are lead authors on the ipc areauth nominated by their government. and so therefore the governmentg say that this represents science as we see it. oncee the they survey the scientific literature and claim to reflect it in their reports. they cherry pick literature e
extend their window for what is accept able for consideration if there s a paper they think helps and ignore papers that don t. sean: patrick michaels experienced the ipcc s biased firsthand. they said they would keep a paper of mine out even if they to review what the peer review literature was. they were bound and determined to have a point of view come through and they succeeded. sean the ipcc s reputation has come under fire for a series of errors in in its reports. those errors all point in the same direction. towards creating a problem where there isn t one. and towards exaggerating it where there is. sean: this is a used in the first and second assessment reports. it shows what scientists refer to as the medieval warm period during which temperatures were as high or higher than they are today. if true this casts doubt on the idea that humans caused global warming.
is accept able for consideration if there s a paper they think helps and ignore papers that don t. sean: patrick michaels experienced the ipcc s biased firsthand. they said they would keep a paper of mine out even if they to review what the peer review literature was. they were bound and determined to have a point of view come through and they succeeded. sean the ipcc s reputation has come under fire for a series of errors in in its reports. those errors all point in the same direction. towards creating a problem where there isn t one. and towards exaggerating it where there is. sean: this is a used in the first and second assessment reports. it shows what scientists refer to as the medieval warm period during which temperatures were as high or higher than they are today. if true this casts doubt on the idea that humans caused global warming. shockingly the medieval warm
reports. they cherry pick literature, extend their window for what is accept able for consideration if there s a paper they think helps and ignore papers that don t. sean: patrick michaels experienced the ipcc s biased firsthand. they said they would keep a paper of mine out even if they to review what the peer review literature was. they were bound and determined to have a point of view come through and they succeeded. sean the ipcc s reputation has come under fire for a series of errors in in its reports. those errors all point in the same direction. towards creating a problem where there isn t one. and towards exaggerating it where there is. sean: this is a used in the first and second assessment reports. it shows what scientists refer to as the medieval warm period during which temperatures were as high or higher than they are today. if true this casts doubt on the idea that humans caused