this data. some coverage says it was off script. no, this is the script. this is it. my feelings on this. i don t think it s necessary to call someone son a loser. you can question whether they were peddling influence and whether that was inappropriate. i think it s a pretty strong argument. the biden pilots are complaining that the dnc isn t defending them enough. the dnc is like you have to be able to defend yourselves. they know it s coming and they are not able to get off the back foot. however, even with all of this in the last three weeks, biden is still doing prewell across the board. he has staying power and may be when people say what doesn t matter when it comes to trump, may be doesn t matter and it biden. greg: i hate to use the phrase baked into the cake because i hate that phrase but with trump, his personality is baked into the cake and biden s foibles. everybody knows what s wrong with biden. they might just have to bite the
i think, is reflected in both this polling and the general political environment in the republican party. sure. not withstanding the fact, as i believe rick knows, hillary clinton actually lost the presidential election and is a private citizen in chappaqua. senator santorum definitely knows. i think i do know that. thank you so much for being with us. turns out michael cohen got a whole lot more money from at&t. we ll have that. and with a republican source saying cohen was peddling influence, sechbling his access to the president, sure does seem like what a lobbyist would do. in a moment, i m going to speak to the one-time king of lobbyists, who served time for his illegal actions. we ll get his take on all of this in just a moment. shed pota! but made from cauliflower. looks like i need a fork! oh no. (giggles) birds eye veggie made. so veggie good. not in this house. cause that s no so-so family.
but, remember, michael cohen had dinner with the president at mar-a-lago not long ago, shortly before the search of his office. that was about stormy daniels, we would think, who knows? i don t know what they talked about but you know if you re a company that has interests in the federal government like at&t, like novartis, like these companies that actually did pay michael cohen, who better to pay? sure, maybe you wouldn t maybe it wouldn t work out but you know, he was peddling influence and it was worth taking a shot. we have to go but very quickly, jeffrey, if he s also taking money from a foreign company like korean aerospace, doesn t he have to register as a foreign agent under the foreign agents registration act? well, that we would have to see, we have to see what the terms are, and lobbyists have to register, too, and i don t i
return for money. if you are using a foundation as a receptacle of that money. it s all kinds of anticorruption crimes. and, you know, it s not the first time that she has been suspected of this. she has also been accused of helping uvs avoid the irs and simultaneously her husband receives $1.5 million from ubs and a 10 fold increase to their foundation. a.p. did a study and they found that half of the nongovernmental people who gained access to hillary clinton donated lavishly to her foundation. if she was peddling access, isn t she also capable of peddling influence. kimberly: that is such a good question. when you learn about this, tom, and you just see the tentacles that really suggest corruption and collusion and, again, this is an ongoing investigation so we have to see where it goes. but we do believe in our
appointed by either sessions or rosenstein. sean: you think rosenstein and mueller has to go? i do. hiding this information, not disclosing to congress when they had a legal obligation to do so seems to be unconscionable and they have no more integrity associated now with trump collusion. sean: now we know there s kickbacks, bribery, extortion, money laundering, i want to know where the money really came from, to the clinton foundation. what is it funneled through latvia or any of these groups? who gave the money? $145 million is a lot of money. who benefited? it was put in and russia. that s the question. a wikileaks document shows she was peddling access and today we learned she was peddling influence. at the risk of american security. absolutely. sean: we will continue all week on this. huge developments today at the harvey weinstein scandal gets