peaceful solution? i much hope is left for a peaceful solution? i think there is very peaceful solution? i think there is very little - peaceful solution? i think there is very little hope i peaceful solution? i think. there is very little hope for peaceful solution? i think i there is very little hope for a peaceful solution at this point. we are already starting to hear the word genocide used in parts of data for, the fighting is taking on an ethnic dimension and parts of the country, it is notjust now the rapid support forces in the sedan armed forces battling, its proxy militias, air militias, foreign fighters from outside the country who are entering into this fight so it is rapidly becoming a regionalised war we are rapidly seeing huge numbers of refugees leaving the country and i think it is going to be very hard to arrest the surveillance or even reverse it if we were to be that lucky. reverse it if we were to be that lucky- reverse it if we were to be that lucky. we d seen
Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh on May 21 had separate meetings with Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelensky, when he was attending the G7 expanded Summit in Hiroshima.
as the president , the united states , to work to bring these parties together, de-escalate and come to a negotiated, peaceful solution. now, some will say, well, tulsi, that s impossible or that s naive to think about. ga i will point those people back to the words that sean: w president gave. we can a have a dialog about it. if you look at, though, he cla invaded a sovereign country. yes, he s claiming it too be hs own. if anyone said hawaii is ours, i think i know it s your home state. i don t think you would like that. and you would want america wouli america, to come defend you, wouldn t you? well, hawai hawi is a partf the united states . so, yes, that would be okay for the united. , one of s the nicest parts of the united states . and you separate and apart.a. i don t blame you, but.i don but do we? in other words, once somebody invades a country and kills t innocent men , womenworld and children, does the world have ahan obligation to stop it early and give in to nuc
responsibility he has as the president of the united states to work to bring these parties together, deescalate and come to a negotiated peaceful solution. some say tulsi, that is impossible. ly point those people back to the words that was kennedy gave sean: we can have a dialogue about it. he invaded a sovereign country. he s claiming it to be his own. if anyone said hawaii is ours, i think i know it s your home state, you would not like that and want america to defend you. hawaii is part of the united states. that would be a problem. sean: one of the nicest parts. you re separate and apart. i don t blame you. but once somebody invades a country and kills innocent men, women and children, does the world have an obligation to stop it early or do you give in to nuclear blackmail? somebody could say i m going to nuke you if you dare support ukraine or whatever country it