questions here. one is the public relations aspect to the question and one is the legal aspect. as a public relations matter, these constantly shifting stories and unraveling tales and the new york times story that says the president had known for months about the payment to stormy daniels, duh it s a great story congratulations to my friends at the new york times but that s the only narrative that really makes any sense. but question whether people in the public who aren t already completely kas pe rated with the president s relationship with the truth are going to be moved by any of this. as a legal matter it s less completely clear to me the implications of this go make donald trump and the people around him life worse materially worse than they were before all of these allegations.
of describing the premier of the giuliani story. i mean, when the president is out there cleaning up after his lawyer, that kind of has things a little bit backwards. i think there s two different questions here. one is the public relations aspect to the question and one is the legal aspect. as a public relations matter, these constantly shifting stories and unraveling tales and the new york times story that says the president had known for months about the payment to stormy daniels, duh it s a great story congratulations to my friends at the new york times but that s the only narrative that really makes any sense. but question whether people in the public who aren t already completely kas pe rated with the president s relationship with the truth are going to be moved by any of this. as a legal matter it s less