thank you for your time today. i know it s a busy time there as this evacuation unfolds and congratulations at least what we ve seen so far and hope it continues to go as smooth as we have been watching it play out here so far. appreciate your time. again, as we continue to cover this story you see an evac twlags. a flooded chemical plant catches fire sending black smoke shooting into the sky back in the houston area triggering new fare. cnn s nick valencia is in the arkema plant near crosby texas. reporter: in may sound lik c semantics, they say what happened in crosby texas at plant, they lost the ability to cool the vessels containing this organic peroxide, highly combustible. because it wasn t being cooled you saw what happened early this morning, 3:00 a.m. local, large plumes of smoke.
operation. you re talking about seman c semantics whether he was with or wasn t with al qaeda. look at the person head of isis, carrying off the move through iraq right now examine and killing so much in that country. also said to be tied to al qaeda just in terms of inspiration, if you will. it s interesting how you can t get away from coming back to that one organization, particularly with benghazi, though, because from the very beginning, we were told they had nothing to do with it. and it s also you re talking about a grup of militants who clan up and work together when they ve got a common goal. i think it s really important for the u.s. to not be that common goal. obviously. but it is such a post modern world where you have you know, who knows who is fighting? who knows if it s al qaeda? who knows where the head of the monster is and how you chop it off and if that s possible. for those keeping track, it s been 642 days since the benghazi
protect, like times square, given a suspect description, they have to wonder about the pc semantics, otherwise they could be sued. who in their right mind would sign up to be a police officer, put themselves in harm s way legally and physically, it makes no sense to me, as a prosecutor, worship police officers, did ride ons, did the whole thing. it is nonsensical. i agree with bloomberg, saying you re opening them up to too much liability. why wouldn t you want to give a police description? you want the wrong person, is that better, preferable? i hope that s a hypothetical question. no, it is not. and are you referring to yourself or eric bolling? it was a blend, pegasus, unicorn. isn t that the basis of police work, profiling?
protect, like times square, given a suspect description, they have to wonder about the pc semantics, otherwise they could be sued. who in their right mind would sign up to be a police officer, put themselves in harm s way legally and physically, it makes no sense to me, as a prosecutor, worship police officers, did ride ons, did the whole thing. it is nonsensical. i agree with bloomberg, saying you re opening them up to too much liability. why wouldn t you want to give a police description? you want the wrong person, is that better, preferable? i hope that s a hypothetical question. no, it is not. and are you referring to yourself or eric bolling? it was a blend, pegasus, unicorn. isn t that the basis of police work, profiling?