Labour leader keir starmer speaking in kent. We expect to hear a lot of personal stories like that as the leaders get out and about around the country meeting people and learning about their priorities, what they want the politicians to deliver in this General Election. As we have said the Prime Minister there at the Vale Of Glamorgan Craft Brewery in south wales. These are the moments when they will speak with business leaders, with voters, with the electorate, and hear about their priorities. One would assume a visit to a hospital and otherfacilities in the coming weeks. With me as alessia fitzgerald. Lets look at what moments like this are for. This is about the leaders being seen in all the right places. It is a photo opportunity. But it is a chance for them to hear from voters about what they need to deliver. fin them to hear from voters about what they need to deliver. They need to deliver. On the first thin , they need to deliver. On the first thing. When they need to deliver.
Yes. The have made . For the Horizon Trial . Yes the most have made . For the Horizon Trial . Yes. The most content have made . For the Horizon Trial . Yes. The most content for have made . For the Horizon Trial . Yes. The most content for the yes. The most content for the Horizon Trial yes. The most content for the Horizon Trial i yes. The most content for the Horizon Trial i pulled yes. The most content for the Horizon Trial i pulled from yes. The most content for the Horizon Trial i pulled from the | Horizon Trial i pulled from the investigations that my team had done investigations that my team had done in the cases. Again, i didnt do any searches on my laptop, and in terms of my diary, not that i can recall. And why not . I of my diary, not that i can recall. And why not . Of my diary, not that i can recall. And why not . Of my diary, not that i can recall. Andwh not . ~. , , and why not . I dont know. Because i didnt think and why not . I dont know. Because i didnt think it and
Bugs disclosed that i became aware ofthem. ~. ,. Of them. We looked already at the December 2010 of them. We looked already at the December 2010 email of them. We looked already at the December 2010 email by of them. We looked already at the December 2010 email by which. Of them. We looked already at the December 2010 email by which email December 2010 e mail by which e mail you were December 2010 e mail by which e mail you were notified of the receipts and payments . | you were notified of the receipts and payments . And payments . I was notified in december and payments . I was notified in December 2010 . And payments . I was notified in December 2010 . | and payments . I was notified in December 2010 . I wasnt. And payments . I was notified in December 2010 . Iwasnt. I and payments . I was notified in | December 2010 . Iwasnt. I dont recall that. The document you took me to which was the record of the discussion, i was not aware of that at the time. Discussion, i was not aware of th
UK government resists pressure to hold statutory inquiry into Post Office Horizon scandal
MPs unite behind call to hold those responsible to account, but minister says it would take too long
Lindsay Clark Tue 27 Apr 2021 // 16:06 UTC Share
Copy
The UK government has resisted calls for statutory public inquiries into the Post Office Horizon scandal in which subpostmasters were wrongly prosecuted over accounting flaws in Fujitsu-built software.
Following last week s Court of Appeal ruling which quashed 39 convictions of Post Office employees, MPs today pressed the government to hold a full public inquiry into the matter.
Shadow minister for science, research and digital Chi Onwurah told MPs that the government s inquiry into the Horizon scandal, announced in September 2020 and to be led by former High Court judge Sir Wyn Williams, would be toothless and could even lead to a whitewash as postmasters had been clear that they would fail to recognise and par
Japanese firm has a reckoning to face
Gareth Corfield Fri 23 Apr 2021 // 14:15 UTC Share
Copy
Post Office employees were wrongly prosecuted by the company as a direct result of it covering up software bugs in its Horizon IT system, the Court of Appeal has said as it quashed 39 convictions this morning.
Those 39 convictions were obtained by the Post Office s in-house lawyers who ignored their own barristers advice that the institution s behaviour was trampling over established prosecutorial codes intended to promote fairness and honesty.
Lord Justice Holroyde said that the one-time state monopoly had, by representing Horizon as reliable, effectively sought to reverse the burden of proof, leading to criminal defendants having to prove their innocence instead of the Post Office showing they were guilty. Its lawyers compounded this by withholding evidence from courts and defence lawyers alike – evidence which clearly showed the Post Office and Fujitsu