all documents concerning any woman who asserted that donald trump touched her inappropriately, including any basis for donald j. trump s statements that any such woman or women fabricated, created or lied about her interactions with him. part of their argument is, that the president is legally immune from being sued because he is president. we respond with the case of paula jones versus president clinton. the u.s. supreme court indicated no man is kbov the law. the supreme court did allow paula jones trial to proceed. president trump says this is a different circumstance.
it one of those things that s different when you do it? yeah, sure. and it s different now. but the law has changed. we didn t face a situation in which the law was clear on whether or not president clinton would be required for example to testify in the paula jones trial, that happened after my time with president clinton, he was in fact required to testify in a civil suit involving sexual harassment. it s inconceivable that president clinton could be required to give testimony in a civil suit involving sexual harassment and yet president trump would not be required to give testimony in a criminal proceeding where the stakes and the public interest issues are so much greater. you make a fair point. so i ronado, you make a for point, and if you have to do the little thing, the civil case, you probably have to do the big thing.