can you get this sense then? if we are able to get people really from the onerous obamacare regulations and mandates that the premiums will calm down and people will be a little choose plants that are good for them, not what the government tells them they should have, that is the whole ball game. i would be happy to vote for a bill likehat. maria: you just mentioned 15%. when i went to the campaign president campaigned on. paul weinstein and the house is 20%. why should we believe you get a tax deal done when health care just failed? are you going to have the same battle when it all comes down to over 15% corporate tax rate versus 20% over possible border adjustment act over deductions that everybody wants to hold onto their deductions and they have their lobbying have their lobby groups. isn t there a lot of battles right now brewing over this tax reform package as well? how did they know to get that done? you are right.
bob: there will be revenue enhancement in this. only way it goes through. eric: the alternative is bad for the tea party as well. the alternative is across-the-board cuts. kimberly: nobody wants that to happen. automatic cuts. eric: after seven of 12 agree on places to cut, here is the issue. it goes back to the house. does the house say no revenue enhancement? that is one of the bob: no amendments there are no amendments straight up as that. i think there are enough tea party people reasonable who will accept tax reform issues to enhance revenue and cuts in spending. i think a deal will get done. politically, everybody s interest to get it done. let s move on to go ahead. greg: do you think there are reasonable tea party people? bob: i do. andrea: i agree that paul weinstein who wrote this argue sums up good reasons why it may succeed but one thing he left out was money.
day address to supportive union members of the afl-cio. but while there, the union leader declared war on the tea party. there is only way to win the war. the one thing about working people is we like a good part. you know what? they got a war with us. we re going to win that war! president obama, this is your army. we are ready to march. let s take the son of a [bleep] down and give america back to america where we belong. thank you very much. kimberly: it sounds like somebody wants a pay-back. what do you make of this? the unions become weaker under the obama administration or stronger? eric: this baffles my mind. mr. hoffa junior saying let s take the s.o.b.s out, i mean take the tea party out. declaration of war. he does a preamble speech. wait for obama and i hope he says that was wrong. but what does he do? thank you, mr. hoffa. he might have well have said comrade, i m with you. this is a socialist agenda exploited and no one was trying to hide it in detroit toda
exist. they are on the brink of deup at the and talking about possible shutdown this fall unless congress steps in. plus. i am talking about program of $1 trillion or more. kimberly: maxine waters calling on president obama to take bold stance on job creation by spending another $1 trillion we don t have. and jane fonda admits her biggest regret in life not sleeping with one of the most notorious communist thugs. we have that and much more. the five starts right now. kimberly: our top story tonight. president obama in detroit earlier today giving a labor day address to supportive union members of the afl-cio. but while there, the union leader declared war on the tea party. there is only way to win the war. the one thing about working people is we like a good part. you know what? they got a war with us. we re going to win that war! president obama, this is your army. we are ready to march. let s take the son of a [bleep] down and give america back to america wh
bob: there will be revenue enhancement in this. only way it goes through. eric: the alternative is bad for the tea party as well. the alternative is across-the-board cuts. kimberly: nobody wants that to happen. automatic cuts. eric: after seven of 12 agree on places to cut, here is the issue. it goes back to the house. does the house say no revenue enhancement? that is one of the bob: no amendments there are no amendments straight up as that. i think there are enough tea party people reasonable who will accept tax reform issues to enhance revenue and cuts in spending. i think a deal will get done. politically, everybody s interest to get it done. let s move on to go ahead. greg: do you think there are reasonable tea party people? bob: i do. andrea: i agree that paul weinstein who wrote this argue sums up good reasons why it may succeed but one thing he left out was money.