while the kids were downstairs watching cartoons. and neighbors saw julie leaving just after 9 am. and, she was at not costar coffee roasting 40 minutes later. she wasn t crying, she wasn t upset. she didn t ask anyone to call 9-1-1. it showed that this woman had a calloused heart. she was capable of murdering her husband. and, really had to be worked to go out into public and appear to be perfectly normal. it was clearly murder. the deputy da watanbe, but was it? remember, julie did not talk, not once to the police or the prosecutor because her attorney never allowed it. but, now, it was time. defensive tierney paul pfingst called just one witness, julie harper. and she said, yes. she didn t. she shot him. but, she said, it wasn t murder. why? because she said, jason harper,
6 am. we are unable to reach a verdict on some of the counts. we are deadlocked deadlocked? on some accounts? but they have been able to reach a unanimous verdict on one count. this was the moment of truth, did the jury believe julia? verdict, first degree murder. we, the jurors, find the defendant julie harper not guilty of the crime of murder for violation yes, they did believe her. she did not preplanned and deliberately kill her husband. so it couldn t be first degree murder. but was it second-degree, not premeditated, but still intentional? on that, the jury was hopelessly deadlocked. the judge declared a mistrial. defense attorney paul pfingst obviously, when there is a verdict trial, and you get acquittal, she would go for total acquittal.