bodies that have to be recovered from this disaster. paul kallen, thank you, denny, thank you. stick around. other questions for you in just a moment. a major ruling today from the nation s highest court and yet again it s on affirmative action. you thought they d already ruled on this? well, guess what, something entirely new and different is coming to a state near you more than likely. salesperson #1: the real deal is the passat tdi clean diesel gets up to 795 highway miles per tank. salesperson #2: actually, we re throwing in a
services in hawaii. and he s going to be there until they send him home to california. he survived and that in itself is being called a miracle. but what he did points up a pretty serious airport security gap. and that is a big problem. if he had a bomb with him in that wheel well, he could have easily taken down that plane. want to talk about the serious situation that we re finding ourselves in with cnn legal analyst paul kallen and danny devolos and live in washington, d.c. an attorney who has worked for the aviation department of u.s. justice and advises on regulatory matters for the faa and the ntsb. you re the perfect person to ask this question. who s responsible for making sure that the airport and the perimeter of the airport is as safe as the inside of the airport? because that seems pretty safe so far. well, i think that is the simple question here, ashleigh. typically at airports throughout the united states, the principal
security or the perimeters around airports. i want to bring in our attorneys on this. here in the studio with me, paul kallen and danny savelis. all sorts of laws at different levels. yet this young man not being charged. any thoughts as to why not? i was looking at adults. he s a juvenile. 16 years old. in the federal system, he would be handled as a juvenile. there are only certain controlled substance and violent crimes where you get tried as an adult. i m sure the feds are looking at this and saying, you know something, the near death experience that this 16-year-old undoubtedly must have experienced, as he was probably almost suffocating or freezing to death, maybe was punishment enough. so he ll be, you know, handled outside of the criminal justice system. but say this were an adult, there are plenty of things that that adult could face for this kind of infraction or these series of infractions. sure, being a stowaway is a federal crime. the federal government has
yes, there could be a charge of reckless manslaughter. south korea belongs to something coupled the imo, the national maritime organization, part of the united nations, and they set the safety regulations for crews ships around the world. if there s a violation and it s a reckless violation that cost a lot of human life, this captain and others on the ship could be facing very, very serious charges under korean law. this is all just starting to play out. let s hope, though, let s hope there are survivors in there. wouldn t that be amazing? it would be an amazing situation. there may be air pockets and we can just have hope. thank you very much. thank you, bobby, thank you jim. and of course our very own paul kallen here. the survivors and family members waiting to find out what happened to their loved ones, they re going through all kinds of emotions, fear, frustration, guilt. a look at their struggle.
a book proposal, actually placed him at every point at the murder scene and the crime route. still, the judge says skakel s lawyers had a chance to ban that from being introduced into evidence yet failed to do so. the brothers that night had actually gone to a club and had been drinking heavily. chris. thank you so much. now, one of the parts of the intrigue is a lot of the information in this decision has been around. so why now and what will it mean going forward? let s bring in legal analyst paul kallen, a former new york city homicide prosecutor, knows these situations very well. glad to have you with us. nice being with you, chris. why is this happening now? do you believe it sticks and there is a retrial? everybody about this case is unusual. the trial occurs in 2002 but the murder was in 1975. this case has gone up on appeal a number of times and a number of connecticut courts, including the connecticut supreme court,