More than once, Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane has been accused of lying to the courts. The issue raised its head again this week in a Constitutional Court ruling which in other respects was favourable to Mkhwebane.
The question at the heart of the latest Constitutional Court judgment was whether the South African Revenue Services (Sars) could withhold former president Jacob Zuma’s tax information on the grounds that taxpayers’ information is protected under the Tax Administration Act, or whether the Public Protector had the right to access that information by means of her subpoena powers, as she maintained.
A high court judgment on the matter previously found that the protection of taxpayer information was part of the constitutional right to privacy, and “serves the important purpose of encouraging voluntary disclosure by taxpayers”. It ordered Mkhwebane to pay 85% of Sars’ legal costs in her personal capacity.
Todos cumplimos hasta que pasó lo de Colo Colo con Antofagasta; de ahínunca más se respetó el protocolo
gda.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from gda.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Invitan a seminario sobre reactivación y empleo
diariolaguino.cl - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from diariolaguino.cl Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Invitan a seminario sobre reactivación y empleo
diariopaillaco.cl - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from diariopaillaco.cl Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.