The Board applies the substantive law of the Federal Circuit and Court of Customs and Patent Appeals on the issue of derivation, which requires sufficient independent corroboration .
Derivation Showing Overcome by Evidence of Respondent’s Prior Conception in Rare Derivation Proceeding - The Board issued a decision in a rare derivation proceeding.
INTA Joins 75th Anniversary Celebration of Lanham Act - International Trademark Association inta.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from inta.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog:
On January 6, 2021, US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Director Andrei Iancu, Commissioner for Patents Andrew Hirshfeld and Chief Administrative Patent Judge Scott Boalick issued a memorandum to the members of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board to align the Board’s approach when deciding indefiniteness issues under 35 USC § 112 in America Invents Act (AIA) post-grant proceedings more closely with district court proceedings. The memo was issued under the PTO director’s authority to set forth binding agency guidance to govern the Board’s interpretation of statutory provisions. The memo cited to similar recent changes to the approach to claim construction in such proceedings, and stated that aligning “the indefiniteness approach [used] in AIA post-grant proceedings [to district court proceedings] will promote consistency and efficient decision making among coordinate branches of government that decide similar issues