intelligence and british intelligence that this thing would be over in a matter of days. the thing that changed it now it s the weapons coming from the west by the things that change in the early days on snake island, when those ukrainians told those russians what they did, was pure gumption. it was pure guts. yes, it really was, it really showed us for the first time with the russians were up against. yep. and why they cannot succeed their. that s right. thanks, ali. have a good show. thank you. today, 233 years after the first supreme court justice took his first oath of office, ketanji brown jackson was sworn in as the 116th supreme court justice, making history in more ways than one. she is the first black woman to serve on the supreme court. and she has increased the number of women on the supreme court to an historic high of four out of the nine justices. justice jackson s husband, doctor patrick jackson, held the jackson family bible and the supreme
from the beginning, from that first moment when they told the russians what they thought they should do. it was very early on, lawrence, but it gave us insight into what the russian troup somewhat the russian people were going to be like in this war, you will recall, in the early days, we are told by u.s. intelligence and british intelligence that this thing would be over in a matter of days. the thing that changed it now it s the weapons coming from the west by the things that changed it the early days on snake island, when those ukrainians told those russians what they did, was pure gumption. it was pure guts. yes, it really was, it really showed us for the first time with the russians were up against. yep. and why they cannot succeed their. that s right. thanks, ali. have a good show. thank you. today, 233 years after the first supreme court justice took his oath of office, ketanji brown jackson was sworn in as the 116th supreme court justice, making
cipollone who i think has a real obligation to come forward although i think he may have some problems in terms of having violated some of the rules of ethics under the code of conduct for lawyers. he may even be responsible for some criminal activity if he didn t report crimes that he knew were not only happening then but that are still happening. the client is not donald trump, his client was the people in the white house, it was the presidency. and he was obligated to take that as his primary target. so, if he was concealing anything that donald trump was doing, that could be assisting him in a crime or it could just be a violation of his responsibilities under the code of conduct. and paul, the subpoena requires pat cipollone to show up, next wednesday, january 6th. but when he is asked questions, he has options that include the fifth amendment.
of conduct. and paul, the subpoena requires pat cipollone to show up, next wednesday, january 6th. but when he is asked questions, he has options that include the fifth amendment. he absolutely can invoke that. he, according to cassidy hutchinson, said, we will be charged with every crime imaginable he said we when he said that. he, according to cassidy hutchinson, said, we will be charged with every crime imaginable he said we when he said that. so, obviously he is suggesting criminal liability for himself. but then there is also this claim that will, i m sure, be played with about executive privilege, which is of course legally preposterous, because the trump presidency doesn t exist anymore. and most of this communication that we are hearing about involves many other people, besides the president. and then there s also one possible credible exception, which is a certain kind of privileged communication. he could, for example, have highly classified communication,