On March 31, Microsoft Corp-backed OpenAI took ChatGPT offline in Italy after the agency, known as Garante, temporarily restricted it and began a probe into a suspected breach of privacy rules. The Italian agency accused OpenAI of failing to check the age of ChatGPT users and criticised the ”absence of any legal basis” that justified the massive collection and storage of personal data.
espionage and interfering in an elections? yes. espionage implies, to me at least, a passive collection. this was much more activist. so when it comes to espionage, we better be careful about throwing rocks. when it comes to interfering in our election, we better be ready to throw rocks. do you agree with that? that s a good metaphor. i believe what obama did was throw a pebble. i would be willing to throw a rock. taking your information about russia s involvement in our election and what they re doing throughout the world, would i be justified in being more aggressive than president obama? that s your choice, sir. do you think he was justified in imposing the sanctions he did? i do. so those who want to throw rocks, you ll get a chance here soon. if we don t throw rocks, we re
election? yes. espionage implies, to me at least, a passive collection. and this was much more activist. so when it comes to espionage, we better be careful about throwing rocks. when it comes to interfering in our election, we better be ready to throw rocks. do you agree with that? that s a good metaphor. i think what obama did was throw a pebble. i m ready to throw a rock. would i be justified as a united states senator taking your information about russia s involvement in our election and what they re doing throughout the world and be more aggressive than president obama if i chose to? that s your choice, senator. do you think he was justified in imposing new sanctions based on what russia did? i do. okay. so to those of you who want to throw rocks, you re going to get a chance here soon. and if we don t throw rocks, we re going to make a huge mistake. admiral rogers, is this going to
the talks. by definition if they re collecting on the talks from the iranians they re picking you on the american side. you don t have to spy on the americans and use spy techniques to pick up on what s going on in the talks. you can spy on the iranians and say now i know what the americans are saying i just heard the iranians talk about it on a telephone call. so you say you re sure there was spying but it s what kind of spying and why they were doing it. correct. and who they re targeting. there is something in the intelligence business called passive collection if you re spying on the iranians and they re talking to the americans, passively, you pick up what the americans are saying. that doesn t mean you targeted the americans for collection. when i saw this story, i immediately wanted to say show me the money. were the facts that they were actually targeting an american and not just picking up knowledge or intelligence from another source big difference. so why did your brot