state level. we had pre-christian and post-christian. again, the point is this is a risk pooling enterprise and if you have one area of the country, you see the share between insurance and federal aid has really flipped. also the number of weather events per year that s cost over a billion dollars in damages from 1980 to 2012 has speck. i mean now the question there is there s two things going on there. there s more concentration of value in areas that are flood prone and there are worse weather events. the question i want to ask is reconceptualizing federal policy and state policy in the face of climate disaster because no one is talking about that and what we ll do we ll keep passing supplementals and keep programs that were put in place in 1968 when you had a complete lui different climate up into the future and penny wise and pound foolish. i want to talk about that after this quick break.
created a infrastructure where we can better protect folks from future events? one of the trends we ve seen there are two trends. a greater share of disaster funding has been coming from federal government as close to state level got we have. i think we have some data on that prekatrina and post katrina. katrina is the innext point and understandably. this is a risk-pooling enterprise and if one area of the country, you see the share between insurance and federal aid has really flipped. also, the number of weather events per year that have coast over $1 billion in damages from 1980 to 2012 has spiked. i mean, now, the question there is there s two things going on there. more concentration of value in areas that are flood-prone and there are worse weather events. and the question i want to ask and the question we need to get to is, reckconceptizing, the faf disaster. no one is talking about that. we re going to keep passing