High level talks end with bipartisan deal. Office of trade and manufacturing policy, Peter Navarro joining me at 8 00 a. M. Hour live coming up. It is jobs friday. Economists are predicting 850,000 jobs added to the economy in month of september. Unemployment rate to tick down to 8. 2 . Special long coverage begins this morning, all hands on deck at 8 00 a. M. Eastern. Markets reacting to the President Trumps coronavirus test. They are negative. Dow futures down 440 points. S p down 57 as the markets react to the president s diagnosis. This after choppy first session of the Fourth Quarter and ended in positive territory. Dow industrials up 35 points, nasdaq up 159 and s p higher by 17 at oclock on wall street. Mornings with maria is live right now. Take a look. European indices down, dax index lower by 139. Korea, hong kong all closed for holidays but nikkei average in japan open was down twothirds of 1 , breaking news overnight President Trump and First Lady Melania Trump have tested
More republicans fall in primaries. Well get. White house advisor Peter Navarro. All that and so much more on making money. Charles like a grizzly, out like a teddy. The shortest bear market in history was a ferocious beast with everyone heading to the hills. Many predictions of a potential doom and Nuclear Winter for stocks that would last for years. Economic data was coming in better than expected there was extreme pessimism on wall street. Meanwhile Something Different was occurring on main street. Regular folks sensed an opportunity. It wasnt just millenial traders populating robinhood. We heard fidelity added 1. 2 million new accounts, lifting assets under management north of 3 trillion. Economic data continued to fool the experts the street took aim at the individual investors. This is where many experts made their fatal flaw, by loudly predicting individual investors would lose everything, as the rebound would not quote, end well, they boxed themselves out of this rebound. Now t
Surveillance and the sort of central question i want to think about today is can intelligence agencies operate in a Democratic Society and be successful at protecting the government and its citizens while also upholding those same Citizens Rights . Especially the right to dissent. In other words, are liberty and procurity compatible . No doubt, there is a need for intelligence communities to operate. Threats exist from foreign and domestic sources, those threats are real. They have been real throughout u. S. History and they can come from across the political spectrum. But for over a century, in addition to taking real threats to the lives of american citizens, bureaus and agencies within the United States government have surveilled those who have expressed what the Cato Institute described as, quote, Strong Political views that run count toer to the prevailing government paradigm. This challenges the notion by those who support a state of some sort if you have nothing to hide, you hav
From foreign and domestic sources, those threats are real. They have been a real threat u. S. History. I think they can come from across the political spectrum. But for over a century, in addition to taking action against real threats to the lives of american citizens, bureaus and agencies within the United States government have surveilled those who have expressed what is described as Strong Political views that run counter to the prevailing government political paradigm. Will this challenge is the notion often expressed, by those who support a surveillance state of some sort, that if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear. And i want to come back to that later on in our discussion. Maybe you would hear to that you, maybe you are on the fence about it, maybe you firmly reject it. That is fine, we will have an opportunity to discuss that later. But the history of abuses in domestic surveillance, in this country, necessitates that discussion. Because the same tools that can
Up Citizens Rights especially the right to dissent. No doubt, there is a need for intelligence communities to operate, to exist. Foreign and domestic threats are real. But for over a century in addition to taking action against real threats to the lives of american citizens, bureaus and agencies within the American Government have surveilled those who have expressed what they Cato Institute Strong Political views that run counter to the prevailing government political paradigm. This challenges the notion that those who support the state in some sort that if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear. I will come back to that later in our discussion. Maybe you adhere to that view, maybe you are on the fence about it, maybe you rejected. That is fine. We will discuss it. But the history of surveillance necessitates that discussion. Can the same tools used to protect be used against citizens for sometimes nefarious reasons. Going back in history, Teddy Roosevelts attorney general