Ill stand up. Laura okay, you are too cool sean unless im forced to in social situations where i have to wear my best. I worn jeans when i interviewed President Trump, even. Laura fine, you are cooler than i am. Nice color coordination. All right, see you tomorrow night. Im laura ingraham, this is the Ingraham Angle from washington. We are going to do things a little bit differently tonight. Now, the angle is not coming until a little later in the show, but everything we discussed will build to it, and you are going to see what we mean. Now come along the way, youre going to hear from ric grenell, steve scalise, Dinesh Dsouza, on the left poisonous tactics to muzzle and target conservatives. Were also going going to dive into the controversy fitting main street against wall street, and how it could change investing forever. But first, last night, we told you about a bizarre dhs Bulletin Warning of supposed threats from what they described as violent domestic extremists, vde. These extr
Laura okay, you are too cool sean unless im forced to in social situations where i have to wear my best. Ive worn jeans when i interviewed President Trump, even. Laura fine, you are cooler than i am. Nice color coordination. All right, see you tomorrow night. Im laura ingraham, this is the Ingraham Angle from washington. Wegh are going to do things a little bit differently tonight. Now, the angle is not coming until a little later in the show, but everything we discussed will build to it, and you are going to see what we mean. Now along the way, youre going to hear from ric grenell, steve scalise, Dinesh Dsouza, on the left poisonous tactics to muzzle and target conservatives. Were also going going to dive into the controversy fitting main street against wall street, ng how it could change investing forever. But first, last night, we told you about a bizarre dhs Bulletin Warning of supposed threats from what they described as violent domestic extremists, vde. Of course, these extremist
Valid and the president appealed and now the case is before the appeals court. Thank you, judge. Oyea oyea oyea, all person having business before the United States court of appeals for the District Of Columbia circuit are admonished to draw near and give attention, god save the United States and Honorable Courts. 195142, donald j. Trump,et al, and [inaudible] mr. Norris. Good morning. Good morning, your honor. May it please the court. In april of 2019 when the Oversight Committee issued this subpoena to mazars it had an extraordinarily broad view of its own investigative authority. According to the committee, the power to subpoena the president s personal papers was could he extensive with the power to legislate and did not have to give any reasons or explanation with what legislative goals its pursuing and had no duty to meaningful narrow or tailor its request. That view of its own authority is reflected in the subpoena which is drafted in incredibly broad terms and substantiated wit
Supreme court. The justices remanded the case back to the lower courts for additional consideration, including separation of powers concerns. Oyea oyea oyea, all person having business before the United States court of a good morning. Good morning, your honor. May it please the court. In april of 2019 when the Oversight Committee issued this subpoena to mazars it had an extraordinarily broad view of its own investigative authority. According to the committee, the power to subpoena the president s personal papers was could he extensive with the power to legislate and did not have to give any reasons or explanation with what legislative goals its pursuing and had no duty to meaningful narrow or tailor its request. That view of its own authority is reflected in the subpoena which is drafted in incredibly broad terms and substantiated with little more than a sentence, a vague sentence in a memo about legislation. But the committees view of its own authority was rejected by the Supreme Cour
May it please the court. In april of 2019 when the Oversight Committee issued this subpoena to mazars it had an extraordinarily broad view of its own investigative authority. According to the committee, the power to subpoena the president s personal papers was could he extensive with the power to legislate and did not have to give any reasons or explanation with what legislative goals its pursuing and had no duty to meaningful narrow or tailor its request. That view of its own authority is reflected in the subpoena which is drafted in incredibly broad terms and substantiated with little more than a sentence, a vague sentence in a memo about legislation. But the committees view of its own authority was rejected by the Supreme Court in this case 90. The Court Announced a new test that substantially restricts congresss power to subpoena the personal papers. In response to that decision the complete did not withdraw, narrow or even reissue the subpoena. It instead attaches a 25,000 word me