The District Court committed multiple fundamental errors in refusing to dismiss this suit and plaintiffs can i ask you to speak up just a little bit . Bring the microphone a little closer, if you can. And the plaintiffs are fundamentally mistaken in asserting that this court is powerless to correct any of those errors at this time. Now, we have identified two different paths through which this court can have mandamus relief. The Supreme Court made clear that separation of powers considerations are of utmost important when considering mandamus petitions involving the president of the United States. For example, the court quoted chief Justice Marshall to say that in no case would a court be required to proceed against the president as it would against a private individual. And moreover, the court said that the high respect that is due the office of the president must be considered throughout the entire proceeding. Now, what does that imply in this case . It implies the following. Their p
181171 Comcast Corporation versus National Association of africanamerican owned media. To mister chief justice may have please the court what is held in this case the plaintiff makes a claim merely by showing that race was a factor considered in the defendants decisionmaking even though the decision would have made and was made for the tightly appropriate business reason having nothing to do with race perk on this basis the ninth circuit for dismissal we submit this is wrong for the reasons that first it is contrary to the courts decision that but for causation is the rule that congress would have to have adopted and then adopted in 1866 are amended in 1991. Second in 1991 and then for the motivating factor and then in other respects at the same time so this shows as this was concluded with respect to the ada and third if he vastly easier to put that and or damages to apply cause of action because it actually enacted by congress and then to mean that in 1981 word completely display the
Held in this case the plaintiff makes a claim merely by showing that race was a factor considered in the defendants decisionmaking even though the decision would have made and was made for the tightly appropriate business reason having nothing to do with race perk on this basis the ninth circuit for dismissal we submit this is wrong for the reasons that first it is contrary to the courts decision that but for causation is the rule that congress would have to have adopted and then adopted in 1866 are amended in 1991. Second in 1991 and then for the motivating factor and then in other respects at the same time so this shows as this was concluded with respect to the ada and third if he vastly easier to put that and or damages to apply cause of action because it actually enacted by congress and then to mean that in 1981 word completely display the carefully tailored White Congress has devised to influence the discrimination case. Nobody would ever assume title vii. Council, what if your di
We didnt break it. We shattered that sucker. We shattered it. And at least he let bigones be bigones. Although we did have a lot of fun fighting hillary, didnt we . People back there, the extremely dishonest press, how about when a major anchor, who hosted a debate, started crying all right. Lets be clear. He was gloating. But was he gloating for himself or for them . Those people in that stadium put their faith in him. So trump went there to let them bask in their victory. He rarely said i, only we. He also made news. We are going to appoint mad dog mattis as our secretary of defense. But were not announcing it until monday, so dont tell anybody. Mad dog. Hes great. He is great. He is great now people like Carol Costello think, oh, my god, a mean general, he might hurt isis feelings. What if al qaeda gets really mad. Sorry, lady, theyre already beheading people. I cant see how pissing them off more matters. And so what if mattis is scary . Thats great his nickname is mad dog. Thats gr
We didnt break it. We shattered that sucker. We shattered it. And at least he let bigones be bigones. Although we did have a lot of fun fighting hillary, didnt we . People back there, the extremely dishonest press, how about when a major anchor, who hosted a debate, started crying all right. Lets be clear. He was gloating. But was he gloating for himself or for them . Those people in that stadium put their faith in him. So trump went there to let them bask in their victory. He rarely said i, only we. He also made news. We are going to appoint mad dog mattis as our secretary of defense. But were not announcing it until monday, so dont tell anybody. Mad dog. Hes great. He is great. He is great now people like Carol Costello think, oh, my god, a mean general, he might hurt isis feelings. What if al qaeda gets really mad. Sorry, lady, theyre already beheading people. I cant see how pissing them off more matters. And so what if mattis is scary . Thats great his nickname is mad dog. Thats gr