A monumental Super Tuesday, donald trump dominated and so did joe biden in 2024 matchup is all but set now and it is a rerun of the 2020 election that nearly cleaved this country in half. Im Abby Phillip In Washington, and im laura coats and new york for november matchup. Isnt white set, but you know what it might as well being nikki haley got when as in singular, as in vermont. But there are plenty of checkmarks to count up with. Former president california, oklahoma virginia colorado, North Carolina, tennessee, texas, arkansas meant god, just like a third rate again, alabama my minnesota, and massachusetts. You added all up and from delegate advantage is to borrow from him huge almost 900 trial Trump Delegates to 60 and change haley delegates. There is arent just crystallized, just how dominant front has been. He is one, a whopping 90 plus percent of all available delegates. He is. It appears inevitable and his march the nomination comes welcome it got nader for the Biden Campaign ev
60 and change haley delegates. Theres arent just crystallized, just how dominant trump has been. He has won a whopping 90 plus percent of all available delegate. It appears inevitable. And his march to the Biden Campaign even as the president picked up a win after win tonight, look at all the states he is historically weak for an incumbent. Looking at the polls, the Biden Campaign clearly wants to make a General Election pivot tonight, painting the choice between him and the former president as one, between moving forward or moving backward into Chaos Division and darkness but achievements. Some of it, much of it inaccurate. Trump diagnosed also what he sees as bodies glaring weaknesses without any prescriptions to actually fix what he believes is broken and no no mentioned from the stage of the woman who trump is beating tonight. And that is nikki haley lets go straight now to harry enten at this magic wall. So glad were here today, so show us some of the winds across these Super Tues
On the future of conservatism. My name is ryan williams, i am president of the Claremont Institute. Before we get started, i would like to offer a few remarks by way of introduction. Our mission at the Claremont Institute is to restore the principles of the american founding to their rightful and preeminent authorities in our national light. To startt it fitting coming to the American Political Science Association over 30 years ago to provide a safe space for the serious discussion of political things for academic friends, admirers, and intelligent critics. Political science over the past halfcentury, much like the social sciences in general, has been obsessed with or consumed by often narrow and therefore measurable aspects of Human Affairs. With the underlying assumption that any great into facts must be separated from any discussion of values. , toave always thought paraphrase leo strauss, to the extent of Human Affairs and political things cannot be properly understood without taki
Way of introduction. Our mission at the Claremont Institute is to restore the principles of the american founding to their rightful and preeminent authorities in our national light. To startt it fitting coming to the American Political Science Association over 30 years ago to provide a safe space for the serious discussion of political things for academic friends, admirers, and intelligent critics. Political science over the past halfcentury, much like the social sciences in general, has been obsessed with or consumed by often narrow and therefore measurable aspects of Human Affairs. Much of modern Political Science must miss a crucial part of political things by leaving aside questions of value. It is in that sense very unscientific, or can be. We have always made our focus the scholarship of the politics of freedom. That brings me to our panel path topic today, the future of conservatism. The future of conservatism indeed the shape and future of our national politics, generally is an
For the serious discussion of political things, admirersmic friends, and intelligent critics of course. Political science over the half past century, much like the social sciences in general, has been obsessed with or consumed by often narrow and therefore measurable aspects of Human Affairs. Underlying assumption that an inquiry into facts must be separated from any discussion values. But weve always thought, to greatrase the late and political flosser, that to the extent Human Affairs and cannot bethings properly understood without taking into account the purposes principles that actually move human beings and political communities, any science or inquiry worth its salt must take truth ofunt the whole political action, facts and values. Or as we prefer to refer to them, moral truths or principles of reason and human nature. Of modern Political Science must miss a crucial part of political things by leaving questions of value. It is in that sense very unscientific or can be. Made our