republicans. i didn t disparage my far right nor did i disparage those, you know, who are moderate. the view of the party should be one that embraces and allows this kind of discussion, this organic discussion. so i just reject out of hand this notion that, you know, i ve got to now get on board because democrats are tripping over themselves to get in front of the supreme court before they hear a case on gay marriage. there are fundamental issues with respect to this subject that are still very important to people out there. you just don t dismiss them because you think, you know, that s what we should be doing right now. okay. let me go back to mike, michael feldman. can your party cartoonize, the republican party continue to do it using the akins, mourdocks, the rick santorums? honestly, if you look at the last presidential cycle, we didn t have to do much work in that area, okay? the primary process was very destructive. if you look at mitt romney s candidacy, by the time he bec
got to now get on board because democrats are tripping over themselves to get in front of the supreme court before they hear a case on gay marriage. there are fundamental issues with respect to this subject that are still very important to people out there. you don t just dismiss them because you think, you know, that s what we should be doing right now. okay. let me go back to mike, michael feldman. can your party cartoonize, the republican party continue to do it using the aikens, mourdocks, the rick santorums? honestly, if you look at the last presidential cycle, we didn t have to do much work in that area, okay? the primary process was very destructive. if you look at mitt romney s candidacy, by the time he became the nominee in his own right, he had to shift back to the center and take responsibility for a lot of what he had to say in the nomina nominating, to the nominating electorate to get the nomination. this is the same problem confronting the republican party as we head
one that embraces and allows this kind of discussion, this organic discussion. so i just reject out of hand this notion that, you know, i ve got to now get on board because democrats are tripping over themselves to get in front of the supreme court before they hear a case on gay marriage. there are fundamental issues with respect to this subject that are still very important to people out there. you just don t dismiss them because you think, you know, that s what we should be doing right now. okay. let me go back to mike, michael feldman. can your party cartoonize, the republican party continue to do it using the akins, mourdocks, the rick santorums? honestly, if you look at the last presidential cycle, we didn t have to do much work in that area, okay? the primary process was very destructive. if you look at mitt romney s candidacy, by the time he became the nominee in his own right, he had to shift back to the center and take responsibility for a lot of what he had to say in the