The failure to get one chair to turn around the voice come on gwen, turn around as the president said in his voice audition song the sun will come out a hundred thousand people signed up for obama care on saturday. The latest day of the recent open enrollment. The consumer has a better interaction. Things are simpler, faster and more intuitive. Jon obama care website is better. For example, when you log into the new healthcare gov it has Insurance Options rather than brunch options at dennys. Also the new website loads quickly. The old site would cut the brakes in your car. Its terrifying. Again its a big improvement. Anyone in washington dc will talk about these amazing success of obama care. All anyone in washington is talking about is a tape that emerged recently of an obama care consultant telling folks what he really thinks about the americans buying the insurance. Jon oh, i bet he thinks theyre really neat. [laughing] jon actually theyre retpefrg to obama care consultant john gru
That providers can communicate more openly and easily sharing information between them about patients. Thats especially important and helpful with Electronic Health platforms when the providers are on the same platform. This can reduce duplicate testing and even conflicting treatment. Payers and providers can share more Meaningful Health care data, Work Together on Health Care Analytics to determine what is the right improvement we can make to quality and cost . The providers within a clinically integrated network can be more familiar with each others, not just their medical practice protocols but their administrative practices. Allowing handoffs to be much smoother with less error. Then also these tighter relationships allow these providers to comment with the payers back to them where there are Service Needs and things that need to be improved. So ill go on to what we also want to talk about, though, and that is there needs to be adequate Consumer Protection and education. Especially
Hints that in fact there could be a military aspect to this program. The fact that assuage International Concerns about possible military uses of technology that the iranians have been developing ask they have been sending inspection teams in 20 check up on all aspects of the program. China and germany is the plus one. A big group on our side. Their issues have to do with really trying to get a handle on these big visible signs that iran may be heading towards a military program. I talked about enrichment capacity and trying to get the enrichment capacity shrunk way down and looking at the heavy water reactor that they have been using to produce Nuclear Weapons. Lots of questions of those kinds. Its not a negotiation im in charge of, but it has been run by sec ter kerry has wrestled with the negotiation. And there a lot of heavy hitters trying to get progress. The big of heavy lifting is on the political side. Will they take the political decisions to bring the negotiation home. We wil
Couple of years. You can get that as well which kind of looks at the issues that we are now going to be looking at as we look to revise our model. We have set up a subgroup which is currently doing regular phone calls. They are open phone calls, anybody, anybody in this room can sit in on them if you have nothing else better to do with your life. I always picture a 40yearold man in his mothers basement. I dont know why. You can provide comments anybody and everybody can provide comments, suggested changes, however you want to do it. Weve gone through a series of calls now where weve had all the stakeholders, the carriers, provide providers, consumers, of course, others that have come in and brought us their ideas. Were going to soon start the process of updating it. There are a couple of areas we are clear we need to update. One is essential Community Provider. Thats not something we were really looking at before. Are those now included in your networks . Theres also issues in the new
Say these things. This say trend unfortunately we see. Nominees start out in support. They change their mind. Which suggests we cant wait out this issue. Its not an age issue. This is a concern about the public and that we keep hearing this concern that the public wont understand what theyre seeing, that they wouldnt understand oral argument is just a part of the process. They wont understand that the justices have to be harsh on both sides. They mied think someone is getting ganged up on. I find this to be concerning because it suggests that more information is actually going to be bad for the public, that the public needs to be shielded from information. It does seem to have an elitism to it that already those of us who do read the transcripts and li listen to the audio or read the reports from the Supreme Court press corps, that were the types that can understand where oral argument falls but tv would reach a different kind of audience who wouldnt understand it. I find this very con