The commission feels like it is appropriate to recuse you, its better to do it now than not at all. Id move that commissioner hayon be permitted to abstain if she wishes to abstain. Thaictionv. She has to be recused, not abstain. ~ im sorry, recused ~. I second. Public comment . Public comment. Yes. [inaudible]. Because of the fact you commission operate under roberts rules of order, the chair cannot make a motion nor can he second a motion. It has to be first or second by one of the other commissioners. Thank you very much. Is that true . Actually, i dont know. But it sound like there are two there is someone else to second it. Actually, thats not true. Okay. Well, i dont think that can be right at all because otherwise i dont think that can be right. [speaker not understood]. Okay. Any other Public Comment on commissioner hayons request to recuse herself . All in favor . Aye. Opposed . Hearing none, commissioner hayon is recused. You know, i wonder at this point whether the most prod
Appearance of a conflict of interest. Kind of should have done that before we he started discussing the question. Oh, okay. So, what does that mean . You can still we would have to have a vote on the recusal. It would have been preferable to do it before, but i think if the commission feels like it is appropriate to recuse you, its better to do it now than not at all. Id move that commissioner hayon be permitted to abstain if she wishes to abstain. Thaictionv. She has to be recused, not abstain. ~ im sorry, recused ~. I second. Public comment . Public comment. Yes. [inaudible]. Because of the fact you commission operate under roberts rules of order, the chair cannot make a motion nor can he second a motion. It has to be first or second by one of the other commissioners. Thank you very much. Is that true . Actually, i dont know. But it sound like there are two there is someone else to second it. Actually, thats not true. Okay. Well, i dont think that can be right at all because otherwis
Curious that there is so much attention paid to the library and its commission and its activities. But you know, maybe we need to just explore what is possible not only at the library, but with other commissions as well, including our own for that matter. I have a question for the City Attorney. If we were to find that there was otherwise that there was a violation, it wasnt mr. Herrera himself. Its that is that feasible . Does the City Attorney have a view on whether the commission, the Library Commission or the library is the appropriate party in light of the history of this matter . Well, i think that the decision currently before you is whether to find mr. Herrera personally has committed a nonwillful violation. I think it is currently beyond the scope for you to come to a decision about whether the Library Commission has committed that violation. So, i dont know if that answers your question completely. I guess what i ineloquently asked is could the commission be a body named in a
Commissioner hayons request to recuse herself . All in favor . Aye. Opposed . Hearing none, commissioner hayon is recused. You know, i wonder at this point whether the most productive thing to do might be to ask the City Attorney the librarian to go back and explore whether there is other accommodation that can be made, whether thats wireless, whether thats battery operated projector with a screen. It sounds like those item have not been fully explored. If the commission is open to that, maybe we can defer the matter, otherwise i stand by my second with commissioner rennes motion. I guess i believe that that suggestion is not necessarily germane to the motion. And although i might agree with it, i think we have to rule on the motion and then we can make some decision as to whether or not we want to give mr. Herrera some guidance a to what we think he ought to be doing. Okay. All in favor . Aye. Opposed . No. It passes 3 to 1. Okay, the motion passes 3 to 1. I would strongly urge the li
Understood that the entire house was sprinkled he was impressed this isnt something you usually find its above and beyond. So when he took the totality into question he said hed have notice problem accepting this when you first handed this to the appellant its the firefighting the appellant saw it. Yes. And wanting wong the matter was continued on october 9th. Okay. Thank you. No further questions anybody thank you for your time. Thank you, commissioners scott on behalf of the appellant. Procedurally this is troubling to us. I dont know what the plan is. When we were here last the issue that concerns the board whether we were right you cant have a second egress over someones property or some reason we were wrong and the answer is we were right thats not a second point of egress. Apparently there is some plan that appraise for some way to deal with the existing issue its not on the agenda. We had over a month to try to work this out and now a were given a set of plans that maybe meets s