Latest Breaking News On - David gladstone - Page 1 : comparemela.com
Any changes as minute as from anything theyve had prior. No, because theyve previously had copies 80 that shows the changes of the windows. So increase no changes. Dont those plans reflect the changes in the egress. Well, it removes the need for the second needs of egress. The plan is changed. Ill let the architect speak to that are. The change is a change before we met in october the plans that were submitted to you and the people appealing its the same plan showing the sliding glass doors it only has a dash line here the numbers indicate that were less than 2 hundred and 50 feet from the further corner of the top deck. It distributes in the description of the work the removal of window and door when i met with the gentleman i shimmed the windows changes and i understood today joe duffey said he didnt care. Thats the only change otherwise well leave the door at the top of the landing. It would meet the egress requirements and well go for a revision permit to put the doors on which the
RomeLazioItalySan-franciscoCaliforniaUnited-statesDavid-gladstoneJoe-duffeyRon-tomGlass-doorsWindow-doorPlanning-departmentThe november 8th. The november 8, 2013, its on the basis as stated in the record by commissioner tom calling names the vicinity is 3 to one for them to impose any actions so absent to any motion this permit is up told me e held as is. I dont think anybody wants that. I would make another motion to continue it for one week and in the interest of efficiency and justice and getting a proper permit here that everyone can agree on. So we have a motion to continue this matter one week to november 20th. And no additional briefing is allowed nothing . On that motion calling names thank you. The vote is 4 to zero this matter is continued one week to november 20th thank you. Thank you commissioners then i will call 7 a, b, c, and d. All four of them are filed by a group against tang and theyre related to four alteration permits. This is for the property on montgomery street on the partners llc to an alteration repair around doors and windowsills. This is for the property at 6568 joebz street pro
San-franciscoCaliforniaUnited-statesDavid-gladstoneStreet-partnersPartners-llcGround-floorFirst-floorLighting-fixturesParty-startStep-forwardJohn-rubinUnderstood that the entire house was sprinkled he was impressed this isnt something you usually find its above and beyond. So when he took the totality into question he said hed have notice problem accepting this when you first handed this to the appellant its the firefighting the appellant saw it. Yes. And wanting wong the matter was continued on october 9th. Okay. Thank you. No further questions anybody thank you for your time. Thank you, commissioners scott on behalf of the appellant. Procedurally this is troubling to us. I dont know what the plan is. When we were here last the issue that concerns the board whether we were right you cant have a second egress over someones property or some reason we were wrong and the answer is we were right thats not a second point of egress. Apparently there is some plan that appraise for some way to deal with the existing issue its not on the agenda. We had over a month to try to work this out and now a were given a set of plans that maybe meets s
RomeLazioItalySan-franciscoCaliforniaUnited-statesIowaDavid-gladstoneJoe-duffeyRon-tomWindows-doorsPublic-comment