and you can t do anything against the team, and the team s leader is donald trump. if you do something against donald trump, you are going to get primeered. it s unfortunately a profile and cowardice that wouldn t stand up for the constitution in your country and you put your party first. we have seen a few profiles encourag encouraged, but very little. and that s part of the reason. the other part of the reason, and this is that a lot of republicans who are not supporting impeachment, they don t always like donald trump but they believe the other team is actually worse. we have to understand that. but i d like to return to a time when people put integrity, i mean is it so hard to have integrity? and put the country above all this partisan posturing, and could we have a leader who doesn t whine and have a leader who actually can tell the truth? i mean, again here these things are low standards in my opinion. a. scott i agree. do you agree wholeheartedly?
concurrences or dissents on his decade on the circuit, has met with 72 senate tours and so far in person. he is making a pitch that he is a mainstream jurist. the m.o. for republican nominees in the supreme court has been to sabotage their nominees. that is not going to happen with gorsuch. he is so beloved. the hit that they tried to pull out on him, he had a wealthy quiet he served well. he engaged an ethics question in an ethics course. it is sad to watch. when you see people saying they will vote against them when they have no actual reasons to vote against them, it looks like partisan posturing. bret: filibuster or no filibuster? i think the conservatives would love if they could abolish the filibuster but probably not going to happen. too stupid. even democrats won t do it. bret: [laughs] fair and balanced. that is it for the panel. next up, the head of the fbi and something you may have missed from the hearings.
concurrences or dissents on his decade on the circuit, has met with 72 senate tours and so far in person. he is making a pitch that he is a mainstream jurist. the m.o. for republican nominees in the supreme court has been to sabotage their nominees. that is not going to happen with gorsuch. he is so beloved. the hit that they tried to pull out on him, he had a wealthy quiet he served well. he engaged an ethics question in an ethics course. it is sad to watch. when you see people saying they will vote against them when they have no actual reasons to vote against them, it looks like partisan posturing. bret: filibuster or no filibuster? i think the conservatives would love if they could abolish the filibuster but probably not going to happen. too stupid. even democrats won t do it. bret: [laughs] fair and balanced. that is it for the panel. next up, the head of the fbi and something you may have missed from the hearings.
show me your evidence that you re a u.s. citizen? i was never asked that when i registered. nor was the other 11 million people in volusia in the state of florida. so why all of a sudden are we having to ask for evidence that you are a u.s. citizen? it just doesn t make sense and i just felt so humbled by listening to the other supervisors. before i let you go, i just want to ask if maybe you can if you think there is an answer to that question, that you just raised at the very end there. why is this happening? why are they doing this? why with this the timing, with the kind of pressure that they re putting on you and the technocratic approach that you and you re other county supervisors seem to have to this issue, why do you think this is happening? i don t want know. i just hope that it isn t some sort of partisan posturing, but i m afraid that s what it s turning out to be. i can assure everybody who s listening tonight that the 67 election supervisors in florida
nor was the other 11 million people in volusia in the state of florida. so why all of a sudden are we having to ask for evidence that you are a u.s. citizen? it just doesn t make sense and i just felt so humbled by listening to the other supervisors. before i let you go, i just want to ask if maybe you can if you think there is an answer to that question, that you just raised at the very end there. why is this happening? why are they doing this? why with this the timing, with the kind of pressure that they re putting on you and the technocratic approach that you and you re other county supervisors seem to have to this issue, why do you think this is happening? i don t want know. i just hope that it isn t some sort of partisan posturing, but