Detention of undocumented immigrants, and relations with the u. S. From sky news, this is 30 minutes. Welcome toello, and question time wrap where we look at the first sitting fortnight of the new morrison government. In february of this year, the government introduced a bill that would allow the minister to exclude anyone from entering australia for up to two years if they were suspected of being involved in any terrorist activity. With a strong mandate off the back of their win, they moved to pass the bill. They did ignore a number of recommendations on the drafting of that bill from the powerful Parliamentary Committee. , the labor of the opposition much less suspect mr. Speaker, [laughter] we will say the answer. My question is to the Prime Minister and it goes to National Security. Does the Prime Minister doubt which side people are on when they support the unanimous position of a Parliamentary Joint Committee on intelligence and security . Thank you, mr. Speaker. I think he raise
Annelise hello, and welcome to question time wrap where we look at the first sitting fortnight of the new morrison government. In february of this year, the government introduced a bill that would allow the minister to exclude anyone from entering australia for up to two years if they were suspected of being involved in any terrorist activity. With a strong mandate off the back of their win, they moved to pass the bill. They did ignore a number of recommendations on the drafting of that bill from the powerful Parliamentary Committee. The labor of the opposition, much less lofty i suspect. [laughter] we will say the answer. My question is to the Prime Minister and it goes to National Security. Does the Prime Minister doubt which side people are on when they support the unanimous position of a Parliamentary Joint Committee on intelligence and security . Thank you, mr. Speaker. I think he raised the role of the joint Standing Committee the joint Standing Committee on these matters does im
Committee. The leader of the opposition now, i less lofty suspect, mr. Speaker. [laughter] we will say the answer. My question is to the Prime Minister and it goes to National Security. Does the Prime Minister doubt which side people are on when they support the unanimous position of a Parliamentary Joint Committee on intelligence and security . Mr. Morrison thank you, mr. Speaker. I thank him for raising the role of the joint Standing Committee. The joint Standing Committee on these matters does important work in the parliament. When members come to that committee, they bring forward the positions of the various parties to address the National Security issues that the countries face. What i have noted in my time in this place is that it has always been those who sit on this side of the house who have always brought the stronger position. It is always on the side of the house, with the measures for the committee, that the matters have. Een found to be watered down therefore, it is the
That would allow the minister to exclude anyone from entering australia for up to two years if they were suspected of being involved in any terrorist activity. With a strong mandate off the back of their resounding election win, they moved to pass the bill. But they did ignore a number of key recommendations on the drafting of the bill from a powerful parliamentary committee. The labor of the opposition, much less lofty now, i suspect. Mr. Speaker. [laughter] we will say the answer. [applause] my question is to the Prime Minister and it goes to National Security. Does the Prime Minister doubt which side people are on when they support the unanimous position of a Parliamentary Joint Committee on intelligence and security . Thank you, mr. Speaker. I think he raised the role of the joint Standing Committee the joint Standing Committee on these matters does important work in the parliament. And when members come to that committee, they bring forward the positions of the various parties to
Time wrap, the First Episode of the 46th parliament, im tom connell. The election, of course, ended on may 18 and there was much commentary about whether or not australian voters had not supported more ambitious action on Climate Change given that was the agenda of labor and they lost the election, but the greens are not lying down saying the action of other countries highlights australias lack of action. My question is to the leader of the government representing the Prime Minister. Minister, 717 jurisdictions across 16 countries have made a declaration that we are living in a Climate Emergency. The Uk Parliament indeed the Uk Parliament led by a conservative government supported the declaration of a Climate Emergency and showed global leadership. So, minister, how does your government justify having such pathetic pollution reduction tags at only 16 when you take into account carryover credits, how do you justify having targets that are completely inconsistent with keeping warming bel