that he didn t obstruct justice. and necessity also which is standard operating procedure. what i don t see here in the report is anything new or even necessarily newsworthy. other than that it s coming from them and i ll decode this for you know this, but you know, they then say to the journal, we have no comment, we would never comment on anything. the leaks from their memo. so obviously they either lost them in a park in washington or they gave them to the wall street journal. your view of that part of the strategy, because my understanding, yours being far more important. my understanding is the question isn t whether you have the authority to fire comey. that s not in kout. the question is whether you abuse the authority to fire him in a manner that might obstruct or impede justice under federal law. that s right. the motive, the why, why was he fired is incredibly important here. that s what in part i think what the special counsel will be investigating and looking at. so
wikileaks in the form of documents in a park in washington. julian assange was on with sean hannity last night and said they didn t get the information from russia. listen? our source is not the russian government. in other words, let me be clear. russia did not give you the podesta documents or anything from the dnc? that s correct can you confirm whether or not you have hacked info from the rnc? we received about three pages of information to do with the rnc and trump, but it was already public. julian assange s source. he s a professional hacker. i mean, he s on the run, on the lam. i agreement it s wrong. was that a solid source, though? do we believe anything he s saying? you have a good point. when he released all of the e-mails, they were legitimate e-mails from podesta, from hillary clinton. if you read the e-mails, what they wrote is what people had a
iran says the drone was an rk-170. that s one of the most secret drones in the u.s. military and intelligence arsenal, essentially a stealth drone, flies undetected, gathering intelligence and targeting information. what is the u.s. say something so far the u.s. is using the alternate aplooins lines in afghanistan to issue a statement is only saying the uav which the iranians may be referring to may be a u.s. unarmed reconnaissance aircraft that had been flying a mission over western afghanistan last week. the operators of the uav lost control of the aircraft and had been working to determine its status. that is what the u.s. is saying about all of this, a loss of flight controls before the drone went down. but what the u.s. isn t saying is that it was shot down or one of the highly classified drones. the key question is do the iranians have their hands on classified u.s. intelligence technology? let s talk more about the pentagon s concerns. how concerned is the pentagon a