ted rowlands was inside the courtroom when that audio was played. ted, it was stunning to hear. i can t imagine what the reaction was like inside the courtroom where michael jacks jackson s family was attending. reporter: to be honest, drew, i was not inside the courtroom during that audio, but i think anybody who heard it was shocked. and the prosecutors used it for one reason, to show that dr. conrad murray knew what he was doing to michael jackson, knew the drugs he was administering to michael jackson had this type of effect. they got that recording from murray s own cell phone so murray was recording jackson in if that distorted state. i mean, you could hear him just trying to slur the words. this was part of an hour and a half that the prosecution went through today in their opening statements with the jury. basically, they said murray was incompetent and that he dropped the ball in leaving jackson alone, not only by giving him the propofol and other drugs, but he l
rich and it s not unfair because we don t take that much from the super rich and we feel like bill: do you understand the philosophical justification behind it. he could have gone to that. the philosophical justification for the liberal community is you owe it to your country because your country provided you the opportunity of becoming a zillionaire. they say that and they say they don t want a bunch of paris hiltons running around. look what happens when you have these rich people leaving their estates to their rich kids. bill: that s not their job. that s the question we have to ask ourselves in this country. is it uncle sam s place to decide if your kids should be a paris hilton. bill: one of the big ones he couldn t answer is the private property confiscation. it isn t about cash. we re talking he says look, o reilly, you got, you know, $5 or $10 million estate, your kids get that when you die, it s like winning the lottery and the same as charging your kids at winni
we don t take that much from the super rich and we feel like bill: do you understand the philosophical justification behind it. he could have gone to that. the philosophical justification for the liberal community is you owe it to your country because your country provided you the opportunity of becoming a zillionaire. they say that and they say they don t want a bunch of paris hiltons running around. look what happens when you have these rich people leaving their estates to their rich kids. bill: that s not their job. that s the question we have to ask ourselves in this country. is it uncle sam s place to decide if your kids should be a paris hilton. bill: one of the big ones he couldn t answer is the private property confiscation. it isn t about cash. we re talking about houses, farms, businesses. he says look, o reilly, you got, you know, $5 or $10 million estate, your kids get that when you die, it s like winning the lottery and the same as charging your kids at winni
they say we take from the super rich and it s not unfair because we don t take that much from the super rich and we feel like bill: do you understand the philosophical justification behind it. he could have gone to that. the philosophical justification for the liberal community is you owe it to your country because your country provided you the opportunity of becoming a zillionaire. they say that and they say they don t want a bunch of paris hiltons running around. look what happens when you have these rich people leaving their estates to their rich kids. bill: that s not their job. that s the question we have to ask ourselves in this country. is it uncle sam s place to decide if your kids should be a paris hilton. bill: one of the big ones he couldn t answer is the private property confiscation. it isn t about cash. we re talking about houses, farms, businesses. he says look, o reilly, you got, you know, $5 or $10 million estate, your kids get that when you die, it s lik
with their family business. that s a real example of who this impacts in america today. not paris hilton on a tractor. all right. let me just say, because i m really taking this quite seriously i appreciate what you re saying. thank you. i looked and said how many farm families have to really pay this tax? because what i was saying to eric was it s a small it s less than a tenth of a percent of americans have to ever pay this tax because it s 5 million 10 million if you re a couple. it says 0.6% of farmers have to pay this tax in 2013. so we re not really talking about but that s because not enough farm people didn t die. is that the problem? it s class warfare. pick on the wealthy because their an easy target. so many people don t have that stature. but doesn t the government have to support itself somehow? i don t think the government deserves to take money from the dead. this isn t about expanding government. this is about creating in a