About having tools and the ability to access their kids accounts and have oversight peer that is what we are trying to do in the state of utah. ashley: when the governor was explaining this, the parent would have to overrate 10:30 each night when the app would shut off but is it a code or face recognition? how would that work and how would it be enforced? those are great questions. what we will do with legislation the department consumer protection is working directly with tech companies to work outside of the technical details of that bill. it would be a tool parents could use. the languages very clear the default setting and the default is for it to shut off middle of the night 10:30 until 6:30 and the parents could override that which, we hope parents don t. we hope kids get some sleep in those accounts go off at night. i think we have a real problem with basically social media
What an interesting development in the TERF wars.
It’s also hugely illustrative of how fluid the definition of “journalism” has become. From expecting a Merriam-Websterish, disinter.
i want you to go back on. and find more. ..and find more. alice is suing 0megle in a landmark case against the social media company. she s hired a new york law firm that s known for going after tech giants. 0megle is a hunting ground for predators. it invites children and adults to be matched randomly and privately and anonymously for chatting. what would you say to people who think that it s up to parents to stop their children going on websites like this? i would say they re wrong. i would say that there s absolutely no way that anybody can account for their child s use of technology 21w. people don t know about 0megle. parents don t know what this is. and it quite literally encourages them to talk to strangers. alice s suit, known as am versus 0megle, is likely to be one of, if not the first time, a tech platform is put on trial for the way it s built.
No way that anybody can account for their child s use of technology 21w. people don t know about omegle. parents don t know what this is. and it quite literally encourages them to talk to strangers. alice s suit, known as am versus omegle, is likely to be one of, if not the first time a tech platform is put on trial for the way it s built. these so called product liability lawsuits are a growing trend and a potential new way for social networks to be held accountable for their alleged wrongdoings. in the united states, we have section 2s0 of the communications decency act, which makes it incredibly difficult to ever sue an online platform. it was originally intended to make it difficult to sue a platform for defamation, but it s been interpreted to make it difficult to sue them for anything, whether it s child sexual exploitation, revenge porn.
Anybody can account for their child s use. of technology 24/7. more so, people - don t know about omegle, parents don t know what this is. - and it quite literallyj encourages them to talk to strangers. alice s suit, known as am versus 0megle, is likely to be one of, if not the first time a tech platform is put on trial for the way it s built. these so called product liability lawsuits are a growing trend, and a potential new way for social networks to be held accountable for their alleged wrongdoings. in the last year, there have been over 100 cases filed against meta, snap, youtube, tiktok and they re all product liability cases. alice s case has been really, really instrumental in arguing for these other platforms to be liable. it s, like, everyone s