comparemela.com

Parent Case News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Zero Hero: Disclaiming Disputed Term Renders Dispute Moot | McDermott Will & Emery

To embed, copy and paste the code into your website or blog: The Trademark Trial & Appeal Board redesignated as precedential a decision dismissing a beverage company’s opposition to trademarks using the term “ZERO” for zero-calorie drinks after the trademark applicant disclaimed the term ZERO in its pending applications, the sole remedy requested in the opposition. Royal Crown Co., Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Co., Opposition Nos. 91178927 (Parent Case); 91180771; 91180772; 91183482; 91185755; 91186579; and 91190658 (TTAB May 3, 2019) (redesignated precedential Mar. 30, 2021) (Hightower, ATJ). The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed with the Board’s decision, holding that disclaiming the term ZERO rendered the dispute moot.

Royal Crown Disclaiming Disputed Term Renders Dispute Moot

Thursday, April 15, 2021 The Trademark Trial & Appeal Board redesignated as precedential a decision dismissing a beverage company’s opposition to trademarks using the term “ZERO” for zero-calorie drinks after the trademark applicant disclaimed the term ZERO in its pending applications, the sole remedy requested in the opposition.  Royal Crown Co., Inc. v. The Coca-Cola Co., Opposition Nos. 91178927 (Parent Case); 91180771; 91180772; 91183482; 91185755; 91186579; and 91190658 (TTAB May 3, 2019) (redesignated precedential Mar. 30, 2021) (Hightower, ATJ). The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit agreed with the Board’s decision, holding that disclaiming the term ZERO rendered the dispute moot.  Royal Crown Co., Inc. v. Coca-Cola Co., Case No. 19-2088 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 3, 2020) (Lourie, J.)

Sekdes Cabul Bujuk Anak di Bawah Umur, Berkali-kali Merayu Korban dengan Iming-iming Rp 35 Ribu

Sekdes Cabul Bujuk Anak di Bawah Umur, Berkali-kali Merayu Korban dengan Iming-iming Rp 35 Ribu
tribunnews.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from tribunnews.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

Turn Back The Clock! TTAB Designates 2019 COKE ZERO Decision Precedential - Intellectual Property

In its original decision in 2016, the Board had ruled that Coca-Cola s marks [E.g., COKE ZERO, SPRITE ZERO, and PIBB ZERO] could be registered with a disclaimer of ZERO because the marks had acquired distinctiveness. [ TTABlogged here]. In 2018, the CAFC reversed, instructing the Board, on remand, to consider whether ZERO refers to a key aspect of the genus, and to make an express finding regarding the degree of the term s descriptiveness. [ TTABlogged here]. When the case got back to the Board, Coke was allowed to enter its disclaimer of ZERO, and the Board dismissed the oppositions. In the subsequent appeal from the dismissal, Royal Crown raised

© 2025 Vimarsana

vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.