The iaea. The Administration Says this is standard procedure. There are confidential agreements reached between the iaea and countries, its standard procedure, but senator cotton said who has seen it . Has anyone on your team seen it . And basically the administration had to say we have not had access to this yet, but that is typical for this situation. Senator cotton says he wants the u. S. Congress to see a it wheren text. Paul thats very unlikely because thats how things are done but you are getting at one of the arguments that republicans will used to push against the broader negotiated deal. Frankly its okay if republicans dont like this deal. The key group that the White House Team has to win over are democrats and also the american people. Were seeing a full press by the administration. They will meet with House Democrats at the white house today. President obama himself will talk to them and were seeing the team make efforts behind the scenes. Secretary kerry had an off the rec
Agreement. They dont square up how do you those statements were very clear clear. First of all, the aim is not to go to military sites. Its not us. Its iaea, of course. The aim is to go to where there is suspicious or suspicion of nuclear relevant activities. If they are in a military site, doesnt matter. They are still the iaea access to those sites. I only have a few seconds left. I would hope that you would reconcile those statements for the public. Youve stated the 24day waiting period for International Inspectors wont allow the regime to conceal any illegal activity, but as i read the agreement and many other people have pointed out to the inspectors request to visit those sites could be delayed much longer than 24 days. I know that youre not concerned about the 24day period. Do you believe that we would that iaea would be able to handle that . But if you look at different parts in section q of the agreement, i think we have the potential that were looking at an 89day delay. You t
So i wanted to also ask about this idea, weve heard a lot about sanctions. And sanctions as i understand, iran has written the United Nations on july 20th about the sanctions regime. And one of the issues that has concerned me about this agreement is that once the sanctions, the long list of mainly congressally mandated sanctions that will be lifted under this agreement are undertaken if iran for example, engaged in terrorist activity, which is known to do, separate from the Nuclear Program, iran seems to have taken the position in its letter to the u. N. And ive actually read the agreement, and ive been concerned that the agreement provides the same that in fact, iran says it has understood that reintroduction or reimposition including through extension of the sanctions and restrictive measures will constitute significant nonperformance which would relieve iran from its commitments in part or in whole. So my question is as i read this, im deeply concerned that if we want to reimpose t
Dont contain anything remotely close to the promise 247 inspections any time. The obama negotiating team has basically, it seems, thrown their hands in the air and yielded unimaginable, unthinkable power to the iranians. We take up why critics are calling the socalled deal a document surrender on the issue of a nuclear iran. Former nato supreme allied commander admiral James Stavridis and james demint here tonight. As the broadcast long suspected he would, president obama today spoke longingly of a third term. It seems mr. Obama cant get enough of being fawned over by the mainstream liberal media and entertainer activists like jon stewart, who act as agents of president s agenda. And the nfl commissioner surprised a few people. The nfl considered the nfls report paid for by the nfl, and chose to support the nfl, upholding the nfls fourgame suspension of new england patriot quarterback tom brady. Well take up why that does not appear to many to be fair and balanced with some of the best
The scope of safeguards and there could be some extensions of authority that are appropriate as part of this agreement. The iaea will require continued Financial Support. The process for Financing Agency activities is to get approval i should wind back again. The iaea is a member of the United Nations family of organizations. As such, it has its own membership and has its own budget and a formula for assessing members in accordance with approved budget to carry out programs. To change that requires today the approval of the 35 governors which is very difficult under any circumstance so whether all 35 would be enough or whether it forcing it to a vote is unusually not the way that the agency would operate. So i would hope that part of the American Perspective on how it can make this effort succeed is to consider a contingency grant to the agency of something on the order of 50 million which sounds like a nice round number but it is much smaller than the i have to say, i dont know exactl