providing that the united states reserves and retains complete ownership, possession and control of presidential records. for more than a year, and despite multiple opportunities to remedied situation and return materials that rightly belong to the federal government, donald trump refused to cooperate time and time again. as we know now from the indictment unsealed by the department of justice yesterday, the former president and his personal valet, and now codefendants, walt nauta have both been indicted. trump along faces 31 counts of willful retention of national defense information, and one count of false statements. both men are also charged with one count each of his conspiracy to obstruct justice, withholding a document, corruptly concealing a document, concealing and documents in a federal investigation, and a scheme to conceal. not to has also in charge for making false statements. the government alleges in his indictment that it s not only a passive bystander that go
democracy. let s talk about the paranoia being ramped up. we ve seen some of your republican colleagues talk about second amendment stuff, guns, you re gonna have to go through may to get to trump, rolling stone is reporting an increase in violent rhetoric throughout sort of maga forums online. which, you will recall, was the same sort of thing that precipitated the january six count. on one hand, i don t see a whole lot of americans prepared to go out, even if they are trump supporters, and put their lives and safety on the line to protest for him. on the other hand, i don t live in these forums! i don t know what motivates people to say this is the last straw. what s your concerns about the safety of the country right now? well, you know, i think we saw after the new york indictment, when trump called his people to come and rally, that they didn t, that that was a sigh of relief to law enforcement. i don t know what the federal indictment, which has attached to its issues of espi
washington. it s just not done. the potential for conflict is far too great. and i think you re talking about the security detail person who also was awarded a contract or associated with a company that was awarded a contract to sweep his office. i don t know how often they do that. i don t ever recall my office being swept when i was at the epa. there s no need for that kind of thing. there s a paranoia being reflected here. no, it s very bad policy to allow people within an administration to have outside jobs. you just can t control it well enough. and you are going to find these kind of conflicts. over the last year, the epa website has been quietly removing mentions of climate change and related terms. if you go to the url that used to link to the climate change section, it says this page is being updated, thank you for your interest, we re updating this website to reflect epa s priorities under the leadership of president trump and epa administrator pruitt.