we have to be very creative here because there are lots of people who have that piece of pap e they may have a passport or visa or have everything but they may not want to bring it with them through taliban check points because if the taliban find that american piece of paper, they re on the taliban s list. right? and so but we know who these folks are. we know their phone numbers. that s another way of identifying people. there may be other creative ways as we contact people to ask them to come to the airport to give them something that isn t obvious to the taliban but may allow our people at the gate to identify them. that s going to take a few days to set up that system and get control of that gate. another reason why there can t be a deadline. you were critical of the biden administration s decision to withdraw all u.s. troops. you thought there should be a remaining presence there, at least for some time. it happened. it s done at this point. although now u.s. has more troops
we have seen the president get involved and kbli indicate things, but is it realistic to think the president wouldn t be involved in these negotiations? no, of course, not. i don t think he can keep himself from being involved. normally when it comes to a major legislative priority like this, yes, the president would be involved. the problem is trump doesn t exactly e know what he wants on daca. i think it s difficult to negotiate with someone who does not know what e he wants. and schumer has expressed frustration about this. republican legislators have expressed frustration about this. it would probably be more conducive to getting a deal if, in fact, trump let it play out without his involvement. it s very unlick likely that would happen. during an interview with cnn this weekend, james langford said the white house frame work should serve as the president s bond. obviously, he just put it on paper. if he s putting it on pap e not