you know, matt, biden s campaign was defined by speaking of chaos, trump was chaos. i m not going to be chaos. we re going to be science-focused. we re going to be this. i wonder if some might say the expectations are too high that he could govern a polarized environment? he wasn t going to say where he was. independents will come back to their general skeptical outlook. i don t think it s a panic number. it s not a good number. it s not what they want. they ve got a lot of time. things are going to change. i think it s important to your point, he was elected, given a very wide margin because he did represent a return to normal see and dignity in the presidency. that s what people wanted. he held himself out as a return to stability and candor. he has gone out throughout this and has spoken directly to the american people several times, taken responsibility. he s explaining things. i think that s going to stand him well over time. if that were eroding, then i think you might see
matt, biden s campaign was defined by speaking of chaos. trump was chaos. i m not going to be chaos. we re going to be science focused, we ll be this. i wonder if and some might say that the expectations are too high that he could govern a polarized environment? he wasn t going to stay where he was. we ve seen the last few administrations, independents will come back to their general skeptical outlook. i don t think it s a panic number. it s not a good number. it s not what they want. they ve got a lot of time. things will change. i think it s important to your point, he was elected, given a very wide margin because he did represent a return to normalcy and dignity and directness and honest any in a presidency. that s what people wanted. he held himself out as a return to stability and candor. he has gone out throughout this and has spoken directly to the american people several times, taken responsibility. he s explaining things. i think that s going to stand him well over tim
trump was chaos. i m not going to be chaos. we re going to be science focused, we ll be this. i wonder if some might say the expectations are too high that he could govern a polarized environment? he wasn t going to stay where he was. independents will come back to their general skeptical outlook. i don t think it s a panic number. it s not a good number. it s not what they want. they ve got a lot of time. things will change. i think it s important to your point, he was elected, given a very wide margin because he did represent a return to normalcy and dignity in the presidency. that s what people wanted. he held himself out as a return to stability and candor. he has gone out throughout this and has spoken directly to the american people several times, taken responsibility. he s explaining things. i think that s going to stand him well over time. if that were eroding, then i think you might see a more permanent slide. i don t think it s time to conclude the president is
but i want to give you a panic number. trump s reelect now, the closest ever percent of wisconsin they think that shutting down the wall is a bad idea. he is losing that sort in the heartland. his job, there was like two points between his job approval and percentage of votes in some of these states. if it continues to drop or hold steady, this is a problem for every republican in the battleground state running. i had a republican very close to the president say for system reas some reason he said this is a read my lips moment. he didn t have to make this his read my lips promise. he is apparently not the world s greatest negotiator. he told me that he was. you re like losing your voice
independently. al awalaki was a top member of al qaedaing and personally declared war on the u.s. a missile from the u.s. drone hit his car in yemen. president obama makes no apology and calls his death a major blow to al qaeda. he directed the failed attempt to blow up an airplane on christmas day. in 200 he directed the failed attempt to blow up cargo planes. and he repeatedly called on individuals in the united states and around the globe to kill innocent men, women and children to advance a murderous agenda. in an interview with cnn s erin burnett today, leon panetta defended the rational for killing al awalki without giving him a trial. this individual was a terrorist. yes, he was a citizen, but if you re a terrorist, you re a terrorist. and that means we have the ability to go after those who would threaten to attack the united states and kill americans. there s no question that the authority and the ability to go after a terrorist is there. barbara star has bee