Pretty telling example of what the state of competition is there. So, i think that the publishers would be able to begin to act like that. Because they have similar levels of market concentration and for partial withdrawals i think the danger with partial withdrawals over just disbanding the Consent Decrees entirely is that we have seen how the pros and ascap act when they think they can partially withdraw and it resulted in a lot of competition problems and my concern is that if the doj was to then say have you seen that now you can partially withdraw it could be even in add ver tently be seen. Mr. Miller i really appreciated your testimony. Just as a reminder of the creative individuals who are in many ways at the beginning of this conversation, although miss griffin reminds us consumers are critical. Theres a lot of different folks involved. A lot of different stage but mr. Miller, not all song writers want to have some of their Performance Rights pulled out of pros and do you agree
I was not the chairman when i came up and it is not permanent work. When i became chairman of h. R. Staffing were taken to make sure be redoing more collaborative vacation in psp like are you still advance it not . It is not within right now. It is in part in the spirit it is completely positive and we have been working with Stakeholder Community through an Advisory Panel on the issue of the single window and imports. We are running a pilot that will come out in a few and we are trying to get it right. We are having this exact collaborations. Okay, my time is out. Ive got one other question, but i will submit the question to you in writing. I thank you can yield back. A chair now recognizes the gentleman said from texas for five minutes. I think the chair. A special welcome to a former house colleague. Good to see you again. I want to talk about nanotechnology. As in 1985 graduate of Rice University in houston, texas we are proud that two of our professors robert crowe and Richard Smal
The importance of financial assistance, but what concerns me is while we zid to death and thus do not provide them the means which with to defend themselves and artillery a attacks, the positions in the eastern rebel held region and last point is countries around the world are watching how reliable a friend we are. And im concerned that this has tremendous detrimental effects encouraging putins aggression and discouraging countries from being friends in the United States because were sitting here providing a few blankets. I dont think thats a good way to go. I realize this is turned into a white house call, but it and last point is there is tremendous bipartisan support in both the house and the senate. For providing this assistance and i really think the administration is isolated on this issue. And thats also something thats not good for the country. Unless you have something you want to add, i dont want to cut you off. Id simply say that, sort of personal observation. I was in budap
Screeria nigeria. Ld and senator joan manchin and ways to discuss youth violence. The Consumer Product Safety Commission is an independent federal agency that regulates the sale and manufacture of thousands of consumerrelated products. The chairs and commissioners were at a house hearing today to discuss the agencys regulatory activities. Congressman Michael Burgess chairs the subcommittee on commerce manufacturing and trade. Chairman will turn on his microphone while the guests take their seats. We will now come to order. The chair will recognize himself five minutes for the purpose of an Opening Statement. The Consumer Product Safety Commission was established in 1972 by congress to protect consumers against unreasonable risks of injuries associated with Consumer Products. The Statutory Mission is a serious responsibility for the commission and is critically important that congress conduct oversight to ensure that Public Confidence in the commissions adherence to its responsibilities
Rule. All the Public Comment except one was against that. But i think what im hearing is you move forward with a little bit more of a heavy hand than what you would represent to us. And you say you want to be engaging the industry and you want to be collaborative, but what i the feedback im getting, those are your words but your actions are much more heavyhanded. That youve determined what you want as the outcome. Thereby, youre going to let people think theyre participating, but in the end youre the rule maker and youre going to get your way. So do you feel like that is a collaborative atmosphere in trying to work with the industry and how would you respond to those type of comments made about the way you all are approaching rule making . Is that for me . Yes, sir. Youre the chairman. And is that question specific to the 1110 rule or more general . It is specifically to 1110, but in general when it comes to dealing with industry. Sure. So ill address both. The 1110 rule is in indefini