The west are counterproductive, i agree with colleague, because today negotiations are a tool on the part of the west to preserve the kiev regime. Yeah, i want to remind you that minsk was followed by debaltsevo kotyul, minsk2, and now we hear that Vladimir Putin often recalls this, we are told that it was simply a gain of time for ukraine, rearmament and a new war. So we have already been taught by this experience, but when they tell us that we are the ones intimidating, you heard what austin said yesterday at the meetings of the senatorial committee, you heard that we are the ones intimidating, when he says, if ukraine loses, nato will have to fight directly, what are you talking about, who is intimidating, absolutely right, what do you think, well, syria has shown that negotiations are possible, but only after certain things. And most likely, most likely, they really work and think in brainstorming, they are just thinking about how to do this with minimal losses for themselves, this
We have the great pleasure of presenting a conversation with josh sapan. Josh saipan is a veteran Media Executive and author. As past ceo of amc networks. Hes credited and with some of my favorite credited with building some of televisions most iconic shows, including mad men breaking portlandia, killing eve. Okay, listen, husband binge watched, killing i dont know, four way too long. It was like crazy i almost got him a therapist, but it was good. It was really good. He also oversaw the spinoff of amc network from cable vision to become a publicly traded company on nasdaq, most recently, he published the third act, a book that celebrates aging in all its accomplishments and grace. And tonight he is selling all these books outside and hes donating proceeds to the green space. So after the program, if you have purchased a book, please go and get a signed copy. Hell be signing copies and giving us this money, which we need to support. Third are journalism and media that sparks change. La
Bodies like this, there are lowerlevel working groups that will feed into this on a regular basis, is that correct . Why dont i asked richard and brandy to talk to that . As somebody who also cochairs the Nuclear Posturing view, i think my colleagues and i serve as the daytoday coaches for the bpr and i think she probably got sick and tired of the end of it when i kept making comparisons to the Nuclear Posture review. I think there was some value there in one of the outcomes in the npr, we do implementation, a lot of those issues that were identified had a body to go back to to be the lead for implementation. In other cases, it was policy or somewhere else. As we were going through the process, we realized, number one, just the value of getting this collective group of people and officials into the same room on really a weekly basis, to have these discussions and dialogue and identify gaps and scenes, wherever they may be. And we kind of recognized, we probably should sustain us in som
Representatives, as well as representatives from northern command, because of their singular responsibility for pandemic preparedness and department of defense support to civil authorities. As well as a special operations command. They have responsibility as the coordinating authority for wmd related activities. It is not just an osd body. It is very much one that will , we hope, weve not met yet, but will have active participation from the services, from the combatant commands, so that it has that element of hearing from all parts of department, where are the challenges and what is needed to get after them. Im assuming, like most bodies like this, there is lowerlevel working groups that will feed into this on a regular basis and meet more often. Is e that correct . Yeah, why dont i ask richard and brandi to talk to that. Sure. Just briefly say is somebody who also cochaired the Nuclear Posture review, i think my colleagues, and dr. Vann and i served as the daytoday cochairs working gr
All the directvidence confirms it used polical data, not racial data to identify republicans and democrats. The panel declared district one a racial gerrymander only by adopting an erroneous racia policy theory. First they failed to enforce th alternative map required. In a case like this oy such an ternative. Second it hyper entangled rac and politics and makes no sense. Thean believe they needed a raci target in Charleston County to achieve its political goal nationwide because 17 racial tge says nothing about vor turnout, says nothing whatsoever about the prodominant majority votes for the predominantly white Charleston County and i irreconcilable th district ones recent history. Moreover the panel agreeing the General Assembly made 34reu8 changes oer parts of district one without using a racial target. E yen assembly has had no reason to and did n use a racial target. Used political day to da to pursue its political goals. If left uncorrected this wl undermine the Courts Holding th