During the entirety of those 13 years i have expressed concerns. You can see the rest of this online at cspan. Org but we will taken out to capitol hill for a hearing to examine the effectiveness of vaccine safety reporting after the roll out of the covid19 vaccine. This includes officials from the cdc and the fda. You are watching live coverage on cspan3. I advised members and remind them of all the rows of corn. The issues we are debating are important. The members feel deeply about. I understand that. While vigorous disagreement is part of the legislative process, members are reminded that we must adhere to established standards of decorum and debate. This is a reminder that is a violation of house rules and the rules of this committee to engage in personalities regarding other members or to question the motives of a colleague. Remarks about type are not permitted by the rules and are not in keeping with the best traditions of our committee. This is a very serious matter. The chair
The Appeals Court hearing on Donald Trumps Immunity Hearing has wrapped up. The threejudge appellant panel facing this big question can the former president be held criminally responsible for actions that he took while in office to overturn the 2020 election loss. We heard a remarkable argument from trumps team who heard the argument that prosecuting a former president would open up a pandoras box as john sauer said that working in the capacity as alleged in the indictment by jack smith, the Special Counsels office pushing back on that. This notion that we are all of the sudden going to be seeing a floodgate, i think that, again, the careful investigations in the clinton era didnt result in any charges. The fact that this investigation did doesnt reflect that we are going to see a sea change of vindictive titfortat prosecutions in the future. I think it reflects fundamentally unprecedented nature of the criminal charges here. Cnns evan perez joins us now. Evan, you were inside of that
greatest been one television. i am not tuesday i am saturday. greg: did you see that tuesday thought it was saturday because he is trans. the stories never stop as logic and reason a secondary site is whatevers rece you are shamed into repeating to your comrades. if only there was a vaccine foa prr that. during the pentagon recent pride event, yes, a pride event, space force lieutenant general alluded to laws in states banning sex changes for minors and how that is preventing her from taking the most qualified candidatees.s. since january this year 400 and tie lgbtq plus laws of it intre level. tthe stat that number is rising and demonstrates aha trend that could berous dangerous for servicemembers it good matchsa fofer a job does not feel safe to perform at their highest potential or if their family could be denied criticalate. healthcare due to the laws of that state.en i am compelled to consider a different candidate and perhaps less qualified. greg: it is an obvious j
the appeals court hearing on donald trump s immunity hearing has wrapped up. the three-judge appellant panel facing this big question can the former president be held criminally responsible for actions that he took while in office to overturn the 2020 election loss. we heard a remarkable argument from trump s team who heard the argument that prosecuting a former president would open up a pandora s box as john sauer said that working in the capacity as alleged in the indictment by jack smith, the special counsel s office pushing back on that. this notion that we are all of the sudden going to be seeing a floodgate, i think that, again, the careful investigations in the clinton era didn t result in any charges. the fact that this investigation did doesn t reflect that we are going to see a sea change of vindictive tit-for-tat prosecutions in the future. i think it reflects fundamentally unprecedented nature of the criminal charges here. cnn s evan perez joins us now. ev
ready to fight. they kicked donald trump off the republican primary ballot and the former president says he will fight back. i m harris faulkner, you are in the faulkner focus. colorado s highest court claims donald trump violated the 14th amendment by inciting an insurrection. that decision is unprecedented and it just so happens to fall along party lines. it s the first time section three of the 14th amendment has ever been used to disqualify the presidential candidate. critics and legal analysts point out trump has never been charged or convicted of anything in connection with the january 6th capitol hill riot. trump s campaign with this. democrat party leaders are in a state of paranoia over the growing dominant lead president trump has amassed in the polls. backlash was fast and furious. it is a strikingly anti-democratic holding. in my view, the court is dead wrong. this court just handed partisans on both sides the ultimate tool to try to shortcut elections. and it