and earned not one, not two, ladies and gentlemen, she earned three separate degrees at yale. she has written several textbooks on constitutional law. if there is one person in this country who is impressive, who our system has deemed capable of making judgments that you don t even understand, it s this lady. this professor, pamela karlan. but think again. and this is a subtheme of the impeachment drama that we would like to highlight because really it s the thing that will endure and change the country long after trump is gone. it turns out the more you know about the people you are supposed to consider impressive, the more you find out they are not impressive at all. actually. they are not very smart. they have no wisdom. their personal lives are a disaster. by the way, if they are so wise, why are they so unhappy? every one of them is. and in this specific case they are not even unbiased arbiters. karlan, for example, she is not some a political
of course, once you pause and consider this all for a moment it, starts to look a little less impressive. none of today s witnesses had any actual evidence against the president. they were instead giving you their opinions. it was a little bit like reading the new republic but less interesting. you probably heard enough impeachment opinions over thanksgiving one from of your drunk cousins. so why would we care what these people think? hmmm, well, because of their credentials. supposedly they have exceptional knowledge and expertise. iqs far higher than yours. all of which enables them to give a fair and balanced and a formed opinion on how america ought to proceed. but is that real? well, consider today s star witness, pam karlan. look up her biography online she is the kenneth and harvard montgomery interest law at stanford. stand back, ladies and gentlemen. and before that she clerked for a supreme court justice and earned not one, not two, ladies and gentlemen, she earned three
academic pulled out of cold starge to testify what we are to do. she is living roomily a political activist who don t united states thousands of dollars to the democratic party. watch this. professor karlan, you gave 2,000 bucks or you gave 1,000 bucks to elizabeth warren, right? i believe so. you gave 1200 bucks to barack obama? i have no reason to question that. and you gave 2,000 bucks to hillary clinton? that s correct. tucker: so does donating to democrats prove that karlan is wrong, no. it doesn t actually. she proved that herself. she made it very clear that she was incapable of clear thinking or wise judgments. instead she made bizarre claims. she claimed that delaying military aid to ukraine was like cutting off rescue services to americans after a hurricane. what? insane and dumb by the way. she also engaged in embarrassing political stunts like ridiculing a president s teenager son. what? what comparisons professor karlan can we make
today? the constitution says there can be no titles of nobility. so while the president can name his son barron, he can t make him a barron. [laughter] thank you, the founding [laughter] tucker: yeah. wonder how long they practiced that one in the mirror? it was petty and dumb. not surprising though. karlan has made remarks like this before. she previously suggested that jeff sessions was evil. why? because of the name his parents gave him. what a mediocrity. in 2006 well before the rest of the left embraced the great awokenning. karlan was ahead the game. she was already bashing people on the basis of sex, skin color and sexual orientation. watch. this we have to seize back the high ground on patriotism and love of our country because we have more reason an they do to love america. the rich, pampered prodigal sanctimonious incurious white, straight sons of the powerful do pretty well everywhere in the world and they always have.
tucker: overturning norms. final question this is not the norm, correct? no it isn t. that person that woman who was testifying, professor karlan, she was seen as a supreme court nominee by the democratic left during a presidential during the democratic presidential administrations. tucker: she is like a parody. she is like a moron. she is a stanford law professor. i would just say her politics aside, that person is not smart. and they are going to put her on the supreme court? tells you a lot. tom, great to see you tonight. thank you. you are welcome. tucker: the press is used to calling the racist, of course, now calling democrats racist for not backing kamala harris. kind of amazing. we have details on that. update our investigation into a hedge fund that disseminated one small town in the midwest. an update for you tonight. we ll be right back.