poll after poll shows even democratic voters, this is what counts, have serious concerns. this recent survey shows 41% of them believe the president is simply too old for a second term. and fox polling shows the majority of democratic primary voters want somebody else as their party nominee. i call it, abb. anybody but biden. it is a fascinating development because in a vacuum, the democrats would never nominate joe biden again. but since joe biden said he is running, the democrats don t have a choice. i think it is a fascinating election cycle, harris. i think there are going to be so many questions thrown at us, so many big things we didn t see coming, one of them will be can he make it to the finish line or will he withdraw at a later date. it is one of the election cycles you don t know what the future holds, and biden running remains up in the air question. i would argue we re not
and actually kill political opponents. we are also seeing that russia has supported the assad regime in syria and helps to facilitate the use of chemical weapons several times in syria. and any use of chemical weapons is absolutely unacceptable. and therefore it is also extremely important that russia understands that it important that russia understands thatitis important that russia understands that it is unacceptable if they consider any use of chemical weapons. we are also very vigilant of the possibility of them trying to stage some kind of pretext, false flag operation to provide an excuse for any type of use of chemical weapons. for any type of use of chemical wea ons. ~ for any type of use of chemical weapons- weapons. we will go to npr. thank ou ve weapons. we will go to npr. thank you very much- weapons. we will go to npr. thank you very much. somewhat - weapons. we will go to npr. thank you very much. somewhat of - weapons. we will go to npr. thank. you very much. somewha
russian killings, the threshold - nato involvement? and a short follow-up, if nato involvement? and a short follow up, if you nato involvement? and a short follow up, if you follow - nato involvement? and a short follow up, if you follow the - nato involvement? and a short - follow up, if you follow the russian rhetoric, follow up, if you follow the russian rhetoric, we follow up, if you follow the russian rhetoric, we are follow up, if you follow the russian rhetoric, we are not follow up, if you follow the russian rhetoric, we are not going - follow up, if you follow the russian rhetoric, we are not going to stop . rhetoric, we are not going to stop purely rhetoric, we are not going to stop purely in rhetoric, we are not going to stop purely in ukraine. rhetoric, we are not going to stop purely in ukraine. so rhetoric, we are not going to stop purely in ukraine. so the - rhetoric, we are not going to stop| purely in ukraine. so the question is isn t purely in ukra
ou, diana advanced air defence systems. thank you, diana michaels, advanced air defence systems. thank you, diana michaels, wall advanced air defence systems. thank you, diana michaels, wall street - you, diana michaels, wall street journal~ you, diana michaels, wall street journal~ to you, diana michaels, wall street journal. to follow you, diana michaels, wall street journal. to follow up you, diana michaels, wall street journal. to follow up on - you, diana michaels, wall street journal. to follow up on an - you, diana michaels, wall streetl journal. to follow up on an earlier question journal. to follow up on an earlier question have journal. to follow up on an earlier question. have apparently- journal. to follow up on an earlier question. have apparently been . journal. to follow up on an earlier. question. have apparently been uav incursions question. have apparently been uav incursions into question. have apparently been uav incursions into nato question. have
up on the question there. she was asking whether up on the question there. she was asking whether nato, up on the question there. she was asking whether nato, what - up on the question there. she was asking whether nato, what nato . up on the question there. she was - asking whether nato, what nato would do and asking whether nato, what nato would do and whether asking whether nato, what nato would do and whether this asking whether nato, what nato would do and whether this changes asking whether nato, what nato would do and whether this changes your - asking whether nato, what nato would do and whether this changes your redl do and whether this changes your red line? do and whether this changes your red line? so. do and whether this changes your red line? so. you do and whether this changes your red line? so. you say do and whether this changes your red line? so, you say you do and whether this changes your red line? so, you say you are do and whether this changes