crossfire hurricane, the investigation into russia, collusioe,n with donald trump ws fairy dust. f it wasake, fake. it was nothing. as matthew mcconaughey said in wolf of wall street , it was a fugazi. fugazi was it was it was a woozy it was nothing but whato we learned todayda with a longit anticipated release of the durham report is that the fbi worked as he workeda disinformation shop for hillary clinton and the democratic nationaic national ct special counsel john durham s report shows us that the samesap people that lecture you today about threats to democracy nearly destroyed it by usingstre our intelligence agencies to target the then republican nominee for president and then later targg president donald trump . the entire story begins no t not b by rigging the election againstt donald trump , though. it starts with rigging aartsh rc clection ition in support of hiy clinton just weeks beforinee fb invefbi launched a crossfire hurricane investigation, wikileaks releas
well, this is that danger.ormatn you actually use this information, i think, againstior an elected president . i think we ve learned the value of projectioearsn over the last several years that usually those that are casting the stones are guilty ofe exac h the the exact sin of which a they accuse. but here s the thing, and ind know this cagen get confusing. the viewer, jonathan . it s almost it st, a it whas at is it, a seven year sagaharact with characters from igor dan chanko to marc sussmanern. but the key is this, as you p point out, and what s madeoi a clear in the durham report, nd the democratic national committee and hillary clinton essentially not just funde ht jd ceded these false stories, they created them with shady characo characters, no backing,a and then peddled it out to the media. buimportt more importantly, bece bu know the media is full of buffoons willing buffoonsthink to the fbi. and the big question, i think,ts is why did the fbi just acceptvt all of this with
abiding citizens and try to overthrow our democracy liked the fbi leadership did, heads have to roll and the reason i say this is because while goo the durham report had a lot ofla good information in there, it also had strategic omissions. and i ll give you a couple of examples. joseph mifsule ed is the indivil who apparently launched not key pahe crossfire hurricane investigation, mueller, he was a key part of the igs report. while he was strategicallyat omitted from durham egicallys e report, durham, along barr tr with attorney general barr, traveledav italy to italy to ler about this guy. but we didn t hear about him from durham. that s the first thing.ything the second w ae didn t hearall anything about stefan halper, the fbt thi informant who was operating as a moonlighting, as some sort oting as sof profen of cambridge. and i thin neek we needrstand to understan wd why those peoplh were not mentioned and why i m so happy to see congressman jordan tweeting publicly that he s inv
to testify publicly is because we need accountability and transparency is needed for the american public to once pu havn have trust in the system that congressman jordan has said he wants to have durham report to to to come beforee congress next week. i m juswet beforeek we go , george , i am curious to ask, you , did you ever think what i you sat down in a pub in london to have a cocktail with a couple of australian diplomats? and it would all lead to this? you re the start, man. i mean, and it s we know nowls a falsehood. did you ever, ever, ine u ever i your wildest imaginations thinki that drink could leankd to thiss war? ? well, you know, i m very happy that durham actually refuted that bogus premise because he statedpremis unequivocally and i know president trump was very vocal sstandardabout himself today, e was absolutely no basis ory no foundation whatsoever to everat. launch an investigation, even publiclyhe eve refuted what this australian diplomat mentionedat and what th
the program. ogram.seven years of this now. i three hundred pages todayve c as you comome e to i don t knowf you ve come to an understanding of something you already knew , but in essence, the the revelation of stuff that everyone should know that re you ve always known. what s your reaction? yeah, well y, will ,ea it h, w . to be with you tonight. i m not sure everything was known. kny i think what reall frustrates me and should frustrate every americanme and f goodwill is that when this information was received from the australian intelligence community and andy mccabommunit, and peter struck received it,din they didn t verify it. they didn t check it out. t t they didn t compare it to what other intelligence operations knew about what the hillary clinton campaign was planning on doing. they immediatelyry clint open ant investigation and then almost immediately try to get fisied ta georants on carter page and george papadopoulos and i think it s outrageous that for e three years,