So thank you for doing that. I ask the department and the director knows how can we be more clear. Were here to be basically working with you to deliver something that you spend a lot of time deliberating with with a large staff hours and hours but we get information that we cant properly support you it then gets sent back. I went through simply i or like a good student through the 9 places in the departments reducing instructions to the applicant and most succinctly under the plans guidelines and what i did because we have the add function in our word document i made red boxes to consistentlyly insert that the plans submittal guidelines should be the common reference for all 59 places. You have liquor one governing document probably the first thing people go to and i want to put in some consistency. One is to use digital photocopy. So that was i think the department accepted that and the next one had something to be with 3d documents and it didnt submit an undue hardship to anyone and
A copy of the planned submittals so you can look through those while we talk. This is actually a simple thing and doesnt really undermine or change anything about what the department is doing its a matter of referencing and getting a little bit more of the depth in tracking the consistency if i may the document that was forwarded to you all thats on our website and was created open february 2012 doesnt include a section for section this was one of our southerners and includes a reference to rendering and 3d rendering and references discretionary review cases in them. So im not clear as to what else you want added. On the first page right under site permit in that paragraph the language will add all other planning applications that maybe reviewed by the Planning Commission. And if i turn the pages it goes into specifics about that. That particular package and subsequent pages have not been exchanged understood. I think i was asked the question for commissioner moore but i did have some
Thing people go to and i want to put in some consistency. One is to use digital photocopy. So that was i think the department accepted that and the next one had something to be with 3d documents and it didnt submit an undue hardship to anyone and simulates the 3d imagine because the tools are inexpensive. Theyre available to anyone for people who have good looking. Theres some other minor subtle things but to my question i dont see the recommendations picked up in the discussion and i want to hear each commissioners comments to my comments relative to the matter. I suffer like i do twho who the fact finding isnt there. Commissioner antonini if im reading this incorrigible on item d under the appendix i guess. Of our rules. And it says standard cases and on number 2 of standard cases it talks about the submittals when commissioner moore was asking for and c talks about digital affirmatives of the conditions 3d digital reverend. Thats what our rules are part of those are actually added d
Ive said it over and over again when are we going to get more cliefrt because drawings submittals that are unclear and circle and often result in having to send cases basing back because we do understand them made me think we need to intensity some clear applications to submit those in a consistent way. As the 7 year sitting here do we have for the first time from the secretary see that that we indeed have a say open appendix a. This was not given to us before so thank you for doing that. I ask the department and the director knows how can we be more clear. Were here to be basically working with you to deliver something that you spend a lot of time deliberating with with a large staff hours and hours but we get information that we cant properly support you it then gets sent back. I went through simply i or like a good student through the 9 places in the departments reducing instructions to the applicant and most succinctly under the plans guidelines and what i did because we have the a
Plans submittal guidelines should be the common reference for all 59 places. You have liquor one governing document probably the first thing people go to and i want to put in some consistency. One is to use digital photocopy. So that was i think the department accepted that and the next one had something to be with 3d documents and it didnt submit an undue hardship to anyone and simulates the 3d imagine because the tools are inexpensive. Theyre available to anyone for people who have good looking. Theres some other minor subtle things but to my question i dont see the recommendations picked up in the discussion and i want to hear each commissioners comments to my comments relative to the matter. I suffer like i do twho who the fact finding isnt there. Commissioner antonini if im reading this incorrigible on item d under the appendix i guess. Of our rules. And it says standard cases and on number 2 of standard cases it talks about the submittals when commissioner moore was asking for an