Yes, i believe so. Okay. And this is just investigation, generally making a public to of openness generally. Right . I think by august 11th, mr. Castor, i think we were talking about 2016 and burisma. The investigation generally was really early in the but do we know that Secretary Pompeo knows that . I think so. Why . Only because i think councilor breakable was briefed on all of these things. By who, by you . I think ambassador volker, by myself. Does not he testified to. I didnt know he testified. Ambassador volker. Oh, okay. He didnt testified that he briefed mr. Brechbuhl. This email to the secretary, he is talking about the statement
which by the way, you said that the statement didnt go anywhere. Ambassador volker said it wasnt a good idea. Mr. Yermak said it wasnt a good idea. The secretary, it relates to a generic openness subject. Right . Yeah, i think the secretary that was on the july 25th call. Which obviously i was not on and i didnt know about. But you use this email to
How to Schedule Websites to Open at Specified Times in Chrome, Firefox, and Edge
makeuseof.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from makeuseof.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
statement in your opening statement? i think you said you couldn t fit it in; is that right? that we might be here for 46 minutes instead of 45 minutes. it wasn t purposeful. trust me. it wasn t purposeful? no. couldn t fit it in a 23 page opener? what they are referring to is the fact in opening statement he said was there quid pro quo with regard to a white house call and white house meeting and he said yes. it wasn t about military aid. he later said he presumed there was. so what happened yesterday, newt. analyze his testimony. well, there are two problems for what this is like other than the fact that schiff is a title liar and a disgrace to the country. steve: how do you really feel? brian: i digress. you watch schiff for a little while, it is truly appalling how deeply dishonest he is. for example, he claims he doesn t know who the whistleblower is.
you can t overturn an election based on presumption. you can stage an impeachment on presumption. you need facts to do that. as the day went on, sondland introduced a new fact. the president, sondland told us, told him explicitly that he did not want a quid pro quo. you said to the president of the united states, what do you want from ukraine? the president, i want nothing, i want no quid pro quo, i want zielinski to do the right thing. i want to do what he ran on, why did you put that statement in your opening states? i think you said you couldn t fit it in, is that right? we might be here for 46 minutes. it wasn t purposeful. wasn t purposeful, could not fit it in a 23 page opener? tucker: smart question, actually, why wasn t the fact and this is not a small point, it s the white which they
based on a presumption. you can t face of impeachment o presumption. you need back to do that. the president had told him explicitly that he didn t want quid pro quo with ukraine. he said to the president of the united states, what you wan from ukraine. the president, i want nothing. i want no quid pro quo. i watch zelensky to do the righ thing. why didn t you put that statement in your opening statement. i think you said you couldn t fit it in. is that right? it wasn t purposeful, trust me. they had a 23 page opener. so why wasn t that back, it is not a small point.
vimarsana © 2020. All Rights Reserved.