Disregard house rules. For what purposes . Just completelyusrules on not i wanted to confirm point addressing the Minority Hearing today. If i hear t that one more time, of order is the rules of ill address that when were decorum. I dont believe the gentleman marking up impeachment articles. What is the use of a minority from florida meant to violate him andnt i want to give him to hearing day if youre going have benefit of o doubt. To hear evidence of the markup than once he referred if you get the confirmation of to a new york lawyer. If hek is prepared to explain what he meant, i will withdraw the master bedroomrkup yourself. My Point Of Order. Even the most heated development does not know show any way that that is not a recognizable Point Of Order. Mr. Chairman, Point Of Order can be theyre. If you destroy the institutional regarding the schedule. There is no Point Of Order integrity, which again, the staff have talked about today, regarding the schedule. Well, onf this case there
bolo. i know everybody s looking at the i.g. report as an end, but it isn t. reports, forget it, republicans are going to keep going. the i.g. report doesn t fit the narrative. they need deep state. they need that as part of the sell. so they re going to pin their hopes on the man handpicked by a.g. barr to lead a separate investigation into what barr believes happened with the russia probe known as spying. u.s. attorney john durham, a man of good reputation. listen to doug collins. bottom line, the report shows the page fisa should have never been obtained. if you don t have the page fisa, you don t have a russia investigation. if you don t have a russia investigation, you can t knock out the president as a candidate at the time in the 2016 election, and you can t hamstring the president s first two years with a special counsel
colluding against president found evidence that president trump to ensure they get him. trump intimidated, threatened, and they re blowing through every procedure to ensure they and tampered with perspective get him in time.ro so what happened today? and actual witnesses in the impeachment inquiry. while we were stuck here, the correct? yes. inspector general report, the and mr. goldman, it is a review of applications of the federal crime to intimidate or toim seek to intimidate any fbi crossfire hurricane investigation. here are some of the top witness appearing before congress. is that right?nt findings. the fbi included inaccurate yes there is a little bit information in the carter page more to it, but that s the gist of it, yes. mr. goldman, am i correct fisa application. that president trump publicly failed to include exculpatory attacked witnesses before, information. after, and even during their therm fbi chose to defensively testimony? that is correct. brief candidate
carter page fisa but also the fisa process generally. so, you know, i also think the american people have watched two weeks of people presuming things like this gentleman did. so i think, you know, at some point in time the actual facts matter. and in this cases in obtaining ex parte, meaning the person you are surveilling doesn t have a lawyer that represents them and doesn t even know they are being surveilled, i think this is a very dangerous to have anybody in the chain of obtaining that warrant that would manipulate evidence or information to obtain that. sandra: president trump suggested that that the the revelation of this report, horowitz report december 9th it s expected. we will hear testimony from horowitz himself it s estimated december 11. he projected that this is going to be historic. do you believe that it will live up to that level of expectation? i do one of the controversial inspector
two questions with that. do you think mark whitaker will release the 19 page fisa surveillance warrant that was signed by rod rosenstein and will he do it before the turnover? we need the 302 s, we need the anti-mccabe memos, we need rod rosenstein to come answer or questions. did you in fact talk about wearing a wire to record the president. did you talk about the 25th amendment as has been alleged? did you do those things? answer our questions. we need all of the information, i hope the new acting attorney general will do that. we ll find out i assume in the next several weeks. martha: matthew whitaker, i said mark. i apologize for that. let s get into the politics, the elections and changes that brings with it. let me play this montage from some of the democrats who will be in leadership positions and i want to get your thoughts on where they may be headed.