you are going to think dope, it s working. if you say they are a leaders. you are going to go, what? am i a loser? am i a loser? that s the worse thing that can happen to you. greg: that s so true. tyrus, if this act doesn t cause people to actually, are you still mad at matt? yeah. going to call me a loser now and it s going to haunt me. [laughter] yes, greg. greg: this was particularly i mean, everything ice success does is horrible. they specifically targeted teenage young girls for this heinous act. if that doesn t move the needle and get people that were always kind of like, well, we should talk about tolerance, shouldn t this be the last straw? you would think that it would be. you would think at that point it would be game on. there is no more left and right. straight middle and everyone is talking the same story. it s funny to me, they will go the extra step to go and donald trump does some weird things.
problem by taxing high fructose corn syrup, right, and they want $100 million of taxpayer money from mexico. that concern is legitimate, but the text of the pact doesn t allow for that. it says that any trade provision any provision this trade pact that contradicts u.s. law is not effective. it s not it doesn t go into effect. i hear you, but i don t know how it s better for it to be written that be the way it s written in the pact that the president supports. when i listen to you talk about it, it sounds like a decent deal, but people who are reading it are saying that language isn t there yet. it s not a done deal, and let s also separate the trade deal from the fast track provision because if it comes back, the president said, you know, it s not done, they will have three months to read, it great. have three months to read it and can do nothing but vote it up or down. that s been the case of the every trade deal ever done. for the last several decades. you can t amend
corn syrup, right, and they want $100 million of taxpayer money from mexico. that concern is legitimate, but the text of the pact doesn t allow for that. it says that any trade provision any provision this trade pact that contradicts u.s. law is not effective. it s not it doesn t go into effect. i hear you, but i don t know how it s better for it to be written that be the way it s written in the pact that the president supports. when i listen to you talk about it, it sounds like a decent deal but people who are reading it are saying that language isn t there yet. it s not a done deal and let s also separate the trade deal from the fast track provision because if it comes back the president said you know it s not done they will have three months to read, it great. have three months to read it and can do nothing but vote it up or down. that s been the case of the every trade deal ever done. for the last several decades. you can t amend it to death. here s my question about
sure people are not you know what if her disability? medical disability, can be mental or physical. have to be define the act doesn t define the disability. the doctor does. she had a doctor. randy? this woman how due you know. she is not disabled. i hit some traffic going in wait a minute, wait a minute. i want to be in my home. do not diminish, do not diminish someone s access to the court system? do you know anybody who gets up and says, can t wait to sit in traffic? no. let s change her hours to noon and one. you re flipping this. i m flipping out over this. let s get straight. the woman has bouts of depression and anxiety. before hand?
generally not admissible. in other words, you can t introduce evidence that somebody used a gun a few weeks before hand. but in south africa, the courts will allow this evidence if it is highly probative. the problem is, this prior act was an accidental discharge. the case at bar is a case of an intentional shooting. even if he was mistaken about who he was shooting. so even the probative value is outweighed by the prejudicial effect. so the judge may conclude he s the kind of guy that shoots guns around when the prior act doesn t have that much to bear on the intentional act of shooting into a bathroom, however mistaken he was. which may be true, but the pushback to you is, this is something that carries a gun around and is pretty cavalier with it. is this someone that would be much more likely to shoot it in ageer? that s why we have a rule in