that s largely based on the testimony of michael flynn, i think it would be a classic defense response to go after flynn himself. how could you not? if so much of mueller s case hinges on the truthfulness of flynn. i think that the administration will have a reasonable argument to say this is a guy who admitted to lying to federal agents. at the same time, i think you ll have to be careful in navigating around the past statements of the president endorsing michael flynn s character, saying that this is a stand-up guy makes it more difficult to launch that line of attack. josh, tom s point that he s making, not surprising, but maybe a little risky. what is the risk in labeling it guy potentially a liar. somebody who was the national security adviser inside the west wing. the highest levels of clearance here and somebody who the president has, as garrett pointed out, the president spoken highly you haof in the p discrediting him as a liar, he was the top national security