investigations? idot to the way that you approached your investigations? investigations? not at all. i tried m best investigations? not at all. i tried my best with investigations? not at all. i tried my best with this investigations? not at all. i tried my best with this statement. i i my best with this statement. i cannot my best with this statement. i cannot put something down. if i was not told cannot put something down. if i was not told about any issues with the horizon not told about any issues with the horizon system, i cannot put that down horizon system, i cannot put that down the horizon system, i cannot put that down. the investigations were done correctly down. the investigations were done correctl . . . down. the investigations were done correctl. ., , , , down. the investigations were done correctl. ., ,, , correctly. that is because you were not told anything correctly. that is because you were not told anything about correctly. that is because you w
the case of lisa brennan. paragraph 33. there were no concerns, the investigation was conducted in a professional manner at all times. over the page, please. professional manner at all times. overthe page, please. i professional manner at all times. over the page, please. i have no other reflections about this matter. lynette hutchings, another case study. paragraph 37, i can see no concerns about the conduct of this case. i have no other reflections about this matter. scrolling down to john bailey. paragraph 40, there were no concerns, the investigation was conducted in a professional manner at all times. scroll down. was conducted in a professional mannerat all times. scroll down. i have no other reflections about this matter. the case of angela sefton. paragraph 43, no concerns. paragraph 44, no other reflections. scrolling
have mentioned it earlier. can we i have mentioned it earlier. can we look at 001 have mentioned it earlier. can we look at 001 2073, have mentioned it earlier. can we look at 001 2073, please? i this is the case of kim wiley. this is not a case study we are going to be looking at. but this is a document of february 2013. that is three years after you received those articles from computer weekly, etc. it has a letter from cartwright king to miss wylie s solicitors. it says, please find enclosed a notice of additional evidence, which includes two statements from stephen bradshaw, dated 20th of november, 2012, a 19th of february, 2013, as well as an exhibit, which is an extract from the supposed masters contract. at the bottom of the page,